In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:15:41 -0700, Emile Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
emile> [...] Also, that it's not clear whether h:* should mean emile> emile> erase_ancestors(b:*) emile> or emile> union (erase_ancestors(b:b1), erase_ancestors(b:b2), ...) emile> emile> Any opinions? Actually, this transends to any globbing pattern. After all, does h:com.circus.* mean `erase_ancestors(b:com.circus.*' or `union(erase_ancestors(b:com.circus.b1), erase_ancestors(b:com.circus.b2), ...)'? Tough question, and I'm not sure I've the answer... Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
