On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 20:03 -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:12:35PM +0100, Christof Petig wrote:
> > I strongly feel that varargs is a bad choice for C++ programs, using
> > your proposed % syntax is much cleaner (as with L() and boost::format).
>
> He actually told me the same thing when I suggested going back to this
> :-). Maybe I agree with you guys... but I should say why I suggested
> it. The thing is that for an API like:
> query("blah") % foo % bar % baz
> I feel rather uncomfortable unless we copy the foo/bar/baz strings
> into the query object;
[...]
> Since we shovel hundreds of megabytes through this interface, reducing
> copying seems worthwhile. I guess we do always copy now, though, so
> actually I guess I have no data on whether the win is valuable or not.
> We spend a lot of time in sqlite, but I don't know where exactly.
Aren't strings copy-on-write anyway, so this shouldn't be a problem?
Tim
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
