On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:05:02PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote: > Ok, this is a taboo subject, but it imho raises the mtn-library and > mtn-frontend(s) discussion again.
It's not a taboo discussion -- my argument downthread is basically, the best way to get to a mtn-library/mtn-frontend split from where we are now, is exactly what we're doing with automate. No-one _objects_ to having a clean, safe, programmatic interface to monotone. But I don't think anyone wants to stop for 6 months and rewrite everything to get there, either (and if we tried doing that, we'd probably fail). So the problem is how to get their incrementally, and 'automate' does that. -- Nathaniel -- "The problem...is that sets have a very limited range of activities -- they can't carry pianos, for example, nor drink beer." _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
