On Tuesday 04 September 2007, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > I also added automate versions of the following normal commands: > > push, pull, sync, merge, update and commit. These are currently not > > very 'automate' friendly in that they still output everything to > > standard out. They work for this purpose though. > > The requirement for landing a new automate command in mainline is that > the semantics (what it does) and interface (how you tell it what to do > and how it tells you what its done) must be fully documented and > tested. Also, we should be willing to keep those semantics and > interface fixed going forward. Having automate access to the > functionality you mention would indeed be nice; you can decide what > the easiest way to get commands that expose that functionality and > meet the bar for automate inclusion is.
Ahem. These are already landed on mainline. The negative effect of using cout / stdout is that they don't work properly over automate stdio... - Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
