William Uther wrote: > > On 05/09/2007, at 12:49 PM, Derek Scherger wrote: > >> It would be nice if we could somehow say "this is here in automate land >> but is still experimental and may change." Could we simply add a >> stable/unstable status to the interface documentation or some sort of >> deprecation indicator that says "this old automate command is going to >> go away in version x.yy" or something? > > I was actually thinking of proposing something like this for my automate > commands, but it was still sitting on the TODO list when Nat posted his > critique. I didn't think that a response to his critique was > politically the best time to propose it (and I still half agree with him > - even if it is experimental, it should still be documented).
Heh... leave it to me to get my foot in my mouth. I do agree that it should be documented, I'd just like to find a way to be able to try out new automate commands while retaining some flexibility in case they don't turn out so well. Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
