Stephen Leake wrote: > Derek Scherger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> At a glance the docs look reasonable. I'm still not sure I prefer the >> old_path and new_path stuff over the node id's though. > > It's a compromise. Can you live with it?
You guys have more experience with it than I do at this point so I'm fine with it. >> Also, I see a FIXME in the docs for the "invalid" status > It's a rare case; unless you can suggest a clearly better name (I > can't), I think it's good enough. Yeah, it's certainly not a big deal. Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
