Am 18.04.10 23:11, schrieb Zack Weinberg:
> I don't have any feedback on this stuff myself, but I want to mention
> that over a year ago, Roland McGrath posted some complaints about the
> mtn:// URI schema being either broken or not useful as designed -- it
> was never clear to me which, because I don't know how it's supposed to
> work.  You might want to dig back through the list archives and see if
> you can't address his concerns as long as you're messing with this
> stuff.

I think you're referring back to this one here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/monotone-devel@nongnu.org/msg11805.html

I quickly skimmed over the discussion and it seems that his major
complaint was that we have no means to select a database in our URI
scheme until now, something which Tim wants to address by allowing
mtn://monotone.ca/database-like uris.

Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | tommyd3...@jabber.ccc.de | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Reply via email to