Thank you both for the replies. Stuart, I assumed that because MVVMCross is newer, no offense. ;) However I'm going to use both of them, for different projects (and fun), and after that I'll be able to make a better choice. Although I really like the MVVM pattern and I think that I'll stick to that.
As it is a very interesting subject I would still like to hear more opinions and experiences about MC and MVVMC. Juan M Gómez @_jmgomez_ Software Engineer 2013/1/12 slodge <[email protected]> > I'm a bit biased... :) > > My answer to this is on: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10224376/mvvmcross-experiences-hindsight-limitations > > Dennis: > - PCLs are optional - it's your app and you can use full > monotouch/monodroid/wp/winrt class libraries if you prefer - you can even > use `#if` sections in your code if you want to. Redth's WshLst code is a > great example of writing native class libraries while consuming PCL > MvvmCross libraries. > - "may or may not line up with your current needs or preferences" - 100% > agree- pick your current tools for your current job. > > Stuart > > ... I'm assuming 'bit less stable' means that it's a bit more active ;) > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/MonoCross-and-or-MVVMCross-experiences-tp4657938p4657940.html > Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > MonoTouch mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch >
_______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
