On Oct 5, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Ernesto wrote: > Am 05.10.2010 16:26 schrieb Oliver Charles: >> On 05/10/10 15:24, Ernesto wrote: >>> New Frost version 0.67 is available on CPAN and my homepage. >>> >>> From the changelog: >>> >>> 0.67 Su. October 3, 2010 >>> - Scalar::Util back in Makefile.PL, corrected doc in Frost >>> - show version of underlying Berkeley DB in t/100_meta/000_version.t >>> - t/000_moose_examples and t/000_moose_recipes added and >>> moved the adopted tests from t/400_recipes here to keep the original >>> Moose's name >>> >>> Ernesto 8-) >>> >> >> I don't want to sound rude here, but I don't really appreciate these >> emails. I subscribed to the Moose mailing list to get news about Moose, >> but this is just a bit too far away from Moose for my liking. >> >> It seems your distribution is mature enough now to have its own mailing >> list; I find this a little to OT for the Moose mailing list. >> > Maybe. On the other hand, Frost is tightly bound to Moose - i.e.: You > can use almost (as yet) all Moose' features plus Frost's persistence by > just saying: > > package Foo::Base; > # use Moose; > use Frost; # extends Moose::Object with persistence > ... > > package Foo; > use Moose; > extends 'Foo::Base'; # inherits all persistence stuff > ... > > package Bar; > use Moose; > extends 'Foo'; # inherits all persistence stuff > ... > > Questions about Frost might show a problem of misunderstanding Moose or > even a bug in Moose - and vice versa. > > So it might be worth having Frost here on [email protected]. > > By the way: MooseX::* is dealt with here, too. > > I'd like to hear more opinions. > > Ernesto 8-)
I agree with the others; this is a mailing list for Moose (and possibly MooseX::*). I don't recall other distributions using Moose (KiokuDB, Fey, etc) posting here. chris
