== New MooTools User Group ==

As part of our offsite initiative, we have moved the community forum
to Google, where it hopefully will not crash and die.  Note that this
group is *not* a replacement for the forum, which will be back
shortly.

--

OK, now as there are some official statements i really doubt to see a
nice community-friendly framework site again.
We do not want to rush you developers, but since the release of 1.2 it
seems a little bit stuck at your site.
Things have been closed and functions spread around the web, not a
good sign for true fans of your framework.

Thanks for the answers anyway.

Nevertheless i do not agree with some of your opinions.
1) google groups is ugly to use and requires google accounts, a freind
of me wanted to post something but was unable because he has signed up
without being enabled for the group yet.
2) a forum is essential for the community, there are plenty stable and
free boards
3) the website should clearly state about all the links we have been
told in the groups chat, i think there are hundrets of ppl who do not
know where to find the spread information
4) in former times we used one page to find all our needs, now it is
lighthouse, git,personal homepages etc, thats poison for everyone
5) i dont like the new online demos, in former times it was easier to
get information, now it requires downloads and offline things...


OK, once again, dont feel rushed.
We just want to help to improve the whole project.


On Sep 17, 7:11 am, Michelle Steigerwalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Oh, except for the bit about the forum.  The forum is back only in
> read-only mode because Google Groups is much more stable and has
> worked out to be a fine solution to user needs. :)  Especially in
> conjunction with Nabble, which is a much nicer frontend to the group.
>
> On Sep 17, 1:06 am, Michelle Steigerwalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Explanation of all changes to the site, along with the reasons for
> > them, is here:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/mootools-users/browse_thread/thread/45...

Reply via email to