So google hosts all versions of the framework, right? It seems moot to hold off to 1.2.1 since some people will no doubt use the same excuse for not upgrading to 1.2.1 that they're using for not leaving 1.11 (and I've been using 1.2, so if google was hosting it, it would've been nice).
Regardless, not my call, but I've got some future plans for google's JS API and word press... On Oct 3, 2:31 pm, VirtuosiMedia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a little curious about what people's experience has been with > this. Has anyone used the MooTools 1.1 version on their site? I read > an article a couple weeks ago by Yahoo > (http://yuiblog.com/blog/2007/01/04/performance-research-part-2/) that > talks about a study the did on user caching. Apparently, according to > them: "40-60% of Yahoo!’s users have an empty cache experience and > ~20% of all page views are done with an empty cache." > > On Oct 3, 9:59 am, CroNiX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not. They have a versioning system, so it shouldn't matter... > > > On Oct 3, 7:28 am, "Nathan White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm glad to see them holding off until 1.2.1. > > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:53 AM, cheeaun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/Google-AJAX-Search-API/browse_thread/t... > > > > > On Oct 3, 11:00 am, "Jeremy B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Does anyone know what it takes to get the latest version of mootools > > > > > on > > > > to > > > > > the google hosted code ajax frameworks? I had looked at it, perhaps > > > > > not thoroughly enough, but I didn't see anything about the 1.2 > > > > > release? > > > > > Jeremy Buelerwww.jbueler.com
