I am only making assumptions here. I think the reason why Valerio decided to hold off until 1.2.1 is because of the maturity of the code. While 1.2 is stable, it was a dramatic change to the framework from 1.1. It was a major update. Being that so much changed there are a few issues. By waiting until 1.2.1 it minimizes the risk of more support issues and removes confusion when 1.2.1 is made live.
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:29 PM, keif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So google hosts all versions of the framework, right? > > It seems moot to hold off to 1.2.1 since some people will no doubt use > the same excuse for not upgrading to 1.2.1 that they're using for not > leaving 1.11 (and I've been using 1.2, so if google was hosting it, it > would've been nice). > > Regardless, not my call, but I've got some future plans for google's > JS API and word press... > > On Oct 3, 2:31 pm, VirtuosiMedia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a little curious about what people's experience has been with > > this. Has anyone used the MooTools 1.1 version on their site? I read > > an article a couple weeks ago by Yahoo ( > http://yuiblog.com/blog/2007/01/04/performance-research-part-2/) that > > talks about a study the did on user caching. Apparently, according to > > them: "40-60% of Yahoo!'s users have an empty cache experience and > > ~20% of all page views are done with an empty cache." > > > > On Oct 3, 9:59 am, CroNiX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm not. They have a versioning system, so it shouldn't matter... > > > > > On Oct 3, 7:28 am, "Nathan White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm glad to see them holding off until 1.2.1. > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:53 AM, cheeaun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-AJAX-Search-API/browse_thread/t... > > > > > > > On Oct 3, 11:00 am, "Jeremy B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone know what it takes to get the latest version of > mootools on > > > > > to > > > > > > the google hosted code ajax frameworks? I had looked at it, > perhaps > > > > > > not thoroughly enough, but I didn't see anything about the 1.2 > release? > > > > > > Jeremy Buelerwww.jbueler.com >
