Valid point indeed.... I'll make the change... I'll push it to my github eventually if I figure out how to make it work properly on windows...
On Oct 12, 1:37 pm, "Guillermo Rauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't put the panels in the options hash. I'd make it an argument of > initialize.Then, when you extend (ie HoverPick.time), you override > initialize and remove that argument. > > It makes more sense too, since it's not an "option". > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:14 PM, SilverTab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, I'm pretty much done with HoverPick.Time but I'm not really > > satisfied with the code... pretty sure it could be done in a better > > way... anyway here it is (basically its just a small extension of > > HoverPick.base with new options. The only method that I've override is > > updateText() where the formatting is done...) > > >http://www.silverscripting.com/MooTimePick/hoverpick.time.html > > > If anyone wants to peek at the code and see how HoverPick.Time can be > > improved, I'll gladly accept any suggestions/ideas! :) > > > On Oct 11, 9:18 pm, Tom Occhino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Very nice progress SilverTab. You've taken a nice plugin and extracted > > > it into a simple generic base for lots of other useful plugins. > > > > Good stuff > > > > On Oct 11, 2008, at 6:16 PM, SilverTab wrote: > > > > > Ok, I've rewritten the HoverPicker class completely... it can now work > > > > with any number of levels (panels)... and I've stripped anything that > > > > was unnecessary (result formatting, etc etc)... so right now it's not > > > > even time or date related, the basic stuff and events are there that's > > > > it.. > > > > > You can see it in action here with 3 and 5 levels: > > > >http://www.silverscripting.com/MooTimePick/test.html > > > > > Next, I'll start on the subclasses, HoverPicker.Time and > > > > HoverPicker.Date > > > > > On Oct 11, 4:16 pm, SilverTab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Quick Update: > > > >> I'm rewritting the base class (HoverPanel.Base) from scratch so that > > > >> it is much more generic and can work with any amount of "panels" ... > > > >> once this is done it will be pretty easy to subclass it and create > > > >> HoverPanel.Time and HoverPanel.Date... > > > > >> I'll post my progress here... > > > > >> On Oct 10, 5:47 pm, SilverTab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >>> First, the latest edge build fixed the IE bug! So right now it's > > > >>> working well in IE, FF, Webkit and Opera.. (which is good news!) > > > >>> Now, Aaron, in reply to your post: > > > > >>> 1) let me know when you're back, I will gladly accept any help I can > > > >>> get! :) > > > > >>> 2) A good date class would definitely help, right now it's still a > > > >>> bit > > > >>> of a mess... > > > > >>> 3) The latest build fixed the issue, but I will still keep > > > >>> Element.setPosition in mind > > > > >>> 4) see 3) > > > > >>> 5) That part is up to you guys! ;) > > > > >>> -silvertab > > > > >>> On Oct 10, 5:22 pm, nutron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >>>> A couple of things: > > > >>>> 1) I'm about to go offline for a day or two, so I can't chip in, > > > >>>> but I'd > > > >>>> love to. I expect you'll have all this sorted out by the time I'm > > > >>>> back > > > >>>> though. > > > > >>>> 2) You might look at Date.js in the Clientside repo. I haven't > > > >>>> looked at the > > > >>>> source code for this plugin yet, but it might be helpful to have > > > >>>> some easier > > > >>>> date methods. > > > > >>>> 3) You might look at Element.setPosition in the Clientside repo, > > > >>>> as it > > > >>>> manages positioning for you (it positions one element relative to > > > >>>> another). > > > >>>> It works in all browsers. > > > > >>>> 4) There WAS a bug in IE that we fixed that will be out next > > > >>>> week. You > > > >>>> could, for the time being, go snag that file out of the git repo > > > >>>> (just with > > > >>>> your web browser - you don't need git to download it) and include > > > >>>> it and see > > > >>>> if it fixes your problems. > > > > >>>> 5) I'd still love to include this in the Clientside repo if it > > > >>>> doesn't go > > > >>>> into MooTools-more. > > > > >>>> -a > > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:01 PM, tomocchino < > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <ml-user > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> They should... but they probably dont :) > > > > >>>>> try with the latest edge build... Aaron / Daniel added a fix for > > > >>>>> getOffsets... > > > > >>>>> On Oct 10, 2008, at 4:41 PM, SilverTab wrote: > > > > >>>>>> Ok, about the IE bug... is it possible that element.getPosition > > > >>>>>> and > > > >>>>>> element.getSize is yielding a different result in IE than in > > > >>>>>> FF?? It > > > >>>>>> shouldn't right?? This is the code I'm using to position the > > > >>>>>> main DIV > > > >>>>>> (keep in mind that "this.el" refers to the text input)... > > > > >>>>>> this.mainDiv = new Element('div', { > > > >>>>>> 'styles' : { > > > >>>>>> 'position': 'absolute', > > > >>>>>> 'width': '100%', > > > >>>>>> 'left': this.el.getPosition().x, > > > >>>>>> 'top': this.el.getPosition().y + this.el.getSize().y > > > >>>>>> } > > > >>>>>> }); > > > > >>>>>> It works fine in FF and Webkit, again, not in IE.... which > > > >>>>>> doesn't > > > >>>>>> make much sense if we consider that getPosition and getSize > > > >>>>>> should > > > >>>>>> return the same results in both browser??? > > > > >>>>>> On Oct 10, 4:24 pm, SilverTab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]< > >http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1317758&i=0 > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> Yeah obviously, it would be easier to use with a shorter date > > > >>>>>>> range... > > > >>>>>>> As far as seconds goes, well I already added it, but it resulted > > > >>>>>>> pretty much in clunkier code... > > > > >>>>>>> I'm trying to think of a way to make it simple AND easy to > > > >>>>>>> extend, > > > >>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>> it might not be as easy as I initially thought... > > > > >>>>>>> I really don't mind sending the code to github or whatever if > > > >>>>>>> anyone > > > >>>>>>> wants to take a look at it and help me figure it out... > > > >>>>>>> problem is, I > > > >>>>>>> only used git on linux and right now I'm on windows so... I'll > > > >>>>>>> have > > > >>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>> find a "git on windows" tutorial or something hehe... (and to > > > >>>>>>> think I > > > >>>>>>> was FINALLY getting used to svn haha).... > > > > >>>>>>> On Oct 10, 4:17 pm, Tom Occhino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]< > >http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1317758&i=1 > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> In my last message when I said 'hours, minutes, seconds' i > > > >>>>>>>> meant > > > >>>>>>>> 'hours, minutes, am/pm'. If a user did decide they needed > > > >>>>>>>> seconds > > > >>>>>>>> as > > > >>>>>>>> well, maybe it could be made easy to extend the > > > >>>>>>>> HoverPicker.Time > > > >>>>>>>> Class > > > >>>>>>>> to add it, but it was just a typo on my part. > > > > >>>>>>>> Anyway, decades sounds like a good way to do the year, but I > > > >>>>>>>> think > > > >>>>>>>> there should be some way to omit it, as in, only allow the > > > >>>>>>>> user to > > > >>>>>>>> pick month and day and have the year be assumed. I was > > > >>>>>>>> originally > > > >>>>>>>> thinking in terms of the 'Publish Article On:' date range > > > >>>>>>>> instead of > > > >>>>>>>> 'When were you born:' date range. > > > > >>>>>>>> If I come up with any good ideas for the interface I'll let you > > > >>>>>>>> know ;) > > > > >>>>>>>> - Tom > > > > >>>>>>>> On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:54 PM, SilverTab wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> Been trying to fix the IE bug for a while with no luck... if > > > >>>>>>>>> anyone > > > >>>>>>>>> has a clue as to why the whole thing isn't positioned > > > >>>>>>>>> properly in > > > >>>>>>>>> IE > > > >>>>>>>>> (it should be like 20 or so pixels lower) please let me > > > >>>>>>>>> know ... > > > > >>>>>>>>> Right now this is what it looks like: > > > >>>>>>>>> Text Element, Div (Positioned absolutely) > ul, ul, ul (all > > > >>>>>>>>> positioned absolutely) > > > > >>>>>>>>> I tried the following: > > > >>>>>>>>> Text Element, Div (Positioned absolutely) > Div (Positioned > > > >>>>>>>>> relatively) > ul, ul, ul (all positioned absolutely) > > > > >>>>>>>>> but no luck... :( > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 10, 2:40 pm, SilverTab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]< > >http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1317758&i=2 > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> Gotta agree that scrolling would make it so much cooler > > > >>>>>>>>>> hehe... > > > > >>>>>>>>>> First thing first though, right now the code is very messy > > > >>>>>>>>>> (i.e. I > > > >>>>>>>>>> didn't code it with Time AND Date in mind so it's not very > > > >>>>>>>>>> "inheritance" friendly...) so the first step I guess would > > > >>>>>>>>>> be to > > > >>>>>>>>>> separate the methods/properties etc to determine if it > > > >>>>>>>>>> should be > > > >>>>>>>>>> part > > > >>>>>>>>>> of .Base, .Date or .Time.... Probably a bunch of methods that > > > >>>>>>>>>> need to > > > >>>>>>>>>> be re-written with that in mind.... > > > > >>>>>>>>>> And IE is still a problem :-( > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 10, 2:34 pm, "Guillermo Rauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]< > >http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1317758&i=3 > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> It's good, but scroll when the right and left boundaries are > > > >>>>>>>>>>> reached would > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be amazing too...For example when there're more than 10 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> elements, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the rest > > > >>>>>>>>>>> are hidden and scrolling is enabled. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> options: { > > > >>>>>>>>>>> scrollAt: 10 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> } > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> It'd be coded into HoverPicker base. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:24 PM, SilverTab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]< > >http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1317758&i=4 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> hmmm should've read your post before I posted mine.... > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> decade is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> definitely a way to do it!.... > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 10, 1:53 pm, "Guillermo Rauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]< > >http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1317758&i=5 > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and a possible implementation for > > ... > > read more »
