I agree. One way would be to add a togglePanel function, which get's fired instead of showPanel, when the user clicks on the input box / clock.
That way by clicking on the input box / clock, the user can open and close it. It would also help if you make the image source an option. It'q quite quick & easy to do. Where can I post the code? J On Oct 13, 6:15 pm, nutron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to suggest that you implement some way to "cancel" out of the > interface. I would do the following: > - Add an event watcher for the document body for clicks. If the user clicks > somewhere other than the elements in your picker, hide it. > - Add a similar event that watches keystrokes; if they hit the escape key, > hide it. > - Consider finding some way to add a tiny "x" in the interface that will > close it (for people who don't try either of the above) > > Was thinking about the name of the class and for some reason, the phrase > "HoverFlow" keeps coming to mind. Maybe because it sounds like "CoverFlow" > which is another popular interface meme. Just thought I'd share. I don't > really have a preference about the name. > > -a > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:06 PM, SilverTab < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > That's good to know! Guess I'll have to change it in my 10+ other > > classes hehe... I'm used to coding pure javascript so... I guess i > > don't always take full advantage of using a framework! > > > On Oct 12, 4:02 pm, Tom Occhino <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1324253&i=0>> > > wrote: > > > > Check the code inside MooTools SilverTab. We use this technique all > > > over. (also, FYI, that's the whole point of the $ function, to be > > > able to pass a string id, or an element to be extended) > > > > this.element = $(element); > > > > On Oct 12, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Rajeev J Sebastian wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:47 PM, SilverTab <[EMAIL > > > > PROTECTED]<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1324253&i=1>> > > wrote: > > > > >> Rajeev: Would this work if the argument (el) is the dom element > > > >> itself > > > >> and not its id? I was only doing it that way so that the user can > > > >> pass > > > >> either the element's id or the element itself... > > > > > Yes, it will work. > > > > > Regards > > > > Rajeev J Sebastian > > > ------------------------------ > > View message @ > >http://n2.nabble.com/Sweet-time-picker-plugin-tp1306377p1324253.html > > To start a new topic under MooTools Users, email > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To unsubscribe from MooTools Users, click here< (link removed) >. > > ----- > The MooTools Tutorial: http://www.mootorial.comwww.mootorial.com > CNET Clientside: http://clientside.cnet.comclientside.cnet.com > -- > View this message in > context:http://n2.nabble.com/Sweet-time-picker-plugin-tp1306377p1329364.html > Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
