Oh, I never knew that moofx was older then mootools. It was totally my understanding that it was the effects library re-written so it wouldn't clash with prototype/scriptaculous and they could happily live together. The website should be disguarded or at least make it clear its garbage.
I don't particularly like ROR, but fact of the matter is it's in place and very hard to get away from due to extensive integration into a very crappy CMS/CRM... and it uses a lot of the default ajax stuff with prototype or whatever... What's my options to get some mootools stuff working with this? Do I have to re-write this to work with prototype instead? Can the same effects be achieved? On Dec 10, 2:28 pm, "Iván N Paz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MooFX was Valerio´s first shot at mootools... its old already and only > there as "history" :-) > > By that time, MooFx used prototype.js, and afterwards he created a > whole new framework named MooTools. > > It has been discussed several times here in the list, on why you can > not bundle together different frameworks... a quick search thru the > archives will yield the relevant issues.... > > Cheers! > Iván > > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM, psudo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm using a pre-existing ajax/mootools slider and trying to implement > > it into ruby on rails which uses the prototype.js. > > > I've downloaded and AFIK properly implimented moofx > > (moofx.mad4milk.net) > > > <!--// DEFAULT RAILS SCRIPTACULOUS //--> > > <%= javascript_include_tag :defaults %> > > > <!--// MOO.FX LIBRARY //--> > > <%= javascript_include_tag "mootools/moo.fx.js" %> > > <%= javascript_include_tag "mootools/moo.fx.pack.js" %> > > <%= javascript_include_tag "mootools/moo.fx.utils.js" %> > > <%= javascript_include_tag "mootools/moo.fx.accordion.js" %> > > <%= javascript_include_tag "mootools/moo.fx.transitions.js" %> > > > But I get 2 errors, one being that "options is not defined" > > Implements: [Options], > > > and "window.addEvent is not a function" > > > When i uncomment the moo.fx scripts and the prototype library and use > > the default mootools it works fine, so I'm assuming the script is ok > > and it could just be to do with the moofx? > > -- > ◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦ > Iván Núñez Paz | Comunica Online | Tel. 902 945 321http://comunicaonline.net/
