On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:02 AM, psudo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh, I never knew that moofx was older then mootools. It was totally my > understanding that it was the effects library re-written so it > wouldn't clash with prototype/scriptaculous and they could happily > live together. The website should be disguarded or at least make it > clear its garbage. > > I don't particularly like ROR, but fact of the matter is it's in place > and very hard to get away from due to extensive integration into a > very crappy CMS/CRM... and it uses a lot of the default ajax stuff > with prototype or whatever... > > What's my options to get some mootools stuff working with this? Do I > have to re-write this to work with prototype instead? Can the same > effects be achieved?
There is an update to moofx (called moofx2) which is available on code.google.com (search for it). I have used it with prototype with very good results. But really, the best way to use motools is of course, the mootools 1.2.1 code, but moofx2 will help when you want mootools fx code for prototype. Afaik, moofx2 is unmaintained. Regards Rajeev J Sebastian
