It was "sine," haha.  That was a typo.  I also changed it to Quad, no
luck there either.

On Dec 23, 11:19 am, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think "cine" is a valid transition.
>
> http://mootools.net/docs/core/Fx/Fx.Transitions
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Ami,
>
> > It seems that there is a bug with the "cine:in" transition you chose to
> > use, I tried it without a specified transition and it worked nicely in IE8.
> > Otherwise you could open a ticket in lighthouse (I dont have the exact
> > link, you could find it in other posts) to get that looked at by the
> > MooTools developers!
>
> > Enjoy
> > -- Roman
>
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Ami <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Hey Roman,
>
> >> Sorry for taking so long to update.  I got caught up in other
> >> projects...
>
> >> So, I've finally implemented all of the settings, and Firefox is
> >> beautiful as usual, but now I don't even get a tween effect in IE7.
> >> It just "jumps" to the new position despite all of the settings.
>
> >> If you'd like, you can check out what I've done at
> >>http://www.3wayevents.com/index_ie.html.
>
> >> Any ideas??
>
> >> Ami
> >> On Dec 18, 11:19 am, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Thats great!
>
> >> > Sure you can, when you init the fx use any of the options:
>
> >> > var _myFx1 = new Fx.Tween(document.id('wrapper'), {
> >> >   // place here any of the options you would otherwise
> >> >   duration: 'long',
> >> >   transition: 'sine:in',
> >> >   fps: 40
>
> >> > })
> >> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Ami <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > Alright, attempted to implement the absolute positioning method...and
> >> > > it almost works. :)
>
> >> > > In firefox the transition is smooth, but in IE the div just "jumps" to
> >> > > the position specified.  Is there any way to set a duration, or fps
> >> > > for this like you can for Fx.Scroll?  It's really important that you
> >> > > be able to see the images etc. in the transition between pages.
>
> >> > > You can see what I'm talking about athttp://
> >> 3wayevents.com/index_ie.html
>
> >> > > On Dec 17, 7:28 pm, Ami <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > I'm headed out of the office right now but will try it first thing
> >> > > > tomorrow morning and keep you posted.  Thanks so so much, again, all
> >> > > > of the help is much appreciated.
>
> >> > > > On Dec 17, 6:58 pm, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > Never tried that plugin.. did you try the absolute positioning?
> >> its
> >> > > easier
> >> > > > > to integrate
>
> >> > > > > If I have time tomorrow I will look into this plugin and try to
> >> help
> >> > > you.
>
> >> > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Ami <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > Attempted to implement SmoothScroll, but it broke all of the
> >> links.
>
> >> > > > > > What I'm gathering from the docs is that SmoothScroll doesn't
> >> work
> >> > > > > > with elements, right?  I'd have to restructure the site?
>
> >> > > > > > On Dec 17, 6:12 pm, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > Tried it with your site but I am getting the same results.
>
> >> > > > > > > Did you try the smoothscroll plugin?
> >> > > > > >http://mootools.net/docs/more/Fx/Fx.SmoothScroll
>
> >> > > > > > > HTH
>
> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Ami <[email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > Nope, I haven't tried that.  Bear with me for a second here,
> >> > > because
> >> > > > > > > > I'm still relatively new to this, what code would I change
> >> to
> >> > > make
> >> > > > > > > > that work?
>
> >> > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 5:31 pm, Roman Land <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > if I recall correctly I had better performance with
> >> absolute
> >> > > > > > positioning
> >> > > > > > > > > (with left: (n)px top: (n)px) instead of using offset with
> >> FX,
> >> > > I cant
> >> > > > > > > > > explain it but it helped. (maybe the browser renders
> >> absolute
> >> > > > > > position
> >> > > > > > > > > movement better then offset..
>
> >> > > > > > > > > Let me know if you've tried it!
>
> >> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Ami <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > Nope...this problem was happening before any of those
> >> scripts
> >> > > were
> >> > > > > > > > > > added, unfortunately.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > I ended up having to give up on it for a while for times
> >> sake
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > > > > > > finish out the site despite the weird issue.  >.<
> >>  Sorry.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks so much for trying to help, you're the first and
> >> only
> >> > > one so
> >> > > > > > > > > > far (across 3 different forums).  Any other possible
> >> tricks
> >> > > up your
> >> > > > > > > > > > sleeve?
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 5:17 pm, Roman Land <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > You could try (for testing at least) removing tracking
> >> > > scripts
> >> > > > > > you
> >> > > > > > > > > > included
> >> > > > > > > > > > > (google and some other ones), I see in their code that
> >> they
> >> > > are
> >> > > > > > > > watching
> >> > > > > > > > > > for
> >> > > > > > > > > > > events
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Ami <
> >> > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > No luck.  :(  Tried lower (all the way down to 1
> >> fps) and
> >> > > > > > higher
> >> > > > > > > > (all
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > the way to 1500fps) and it changes frequency, but
> >> it's
> >> > > still
> >> > > > > > very
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > obvious.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > ...Any other ideas?
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > This is so strange!!
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 4:22 pm, Roman Land <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your code looks good (except maybe that you are
> >> > > creating new
> >> > > > > > > > event to
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > stop
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > bubling... but that does effect the scrolling
> >> issue).
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I would try playing with the FPS valuehttp://
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >www.docs.mootools.net/docs/core/Fx/Fx
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > My guess that a lower value (default 50) will
> >> resolve
> >> > > this
> >> > > > > > issue,
> >> > > > > > > > but
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > maybe
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > a higher one :)
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Please update if this helped..
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Ami <
> >> > > > > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help! I'm at my wits end trying to figure
> >> this
> >> > > out.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I used the Fx.Scroll effect on a website I
> >> recently
> >> > > > > > developed,
> >> > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > > > it
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > works beautifully in Firefox, but on every
> >> version of
> >> > > IE
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > effect
> >> > > > > > > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shaky and a little nauseating to watch. Can
> >> anyone
> >> > > give me
> >> > > > > > some
> >> > > > > > > > > > sort
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of clue as to why this happens and what I can do
> >> to
> >> > > fix it?
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've tried removing all the images (its a very
> >> image
> >> > > heavy
> >> > > > > > > > site),
> >> > > > > > > > > > as
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > well as removing the other scripts I have
> >> running on
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > > same
> >> > > > > > > > page,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > all to no avail.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The site URL ishttp://www.3wayevents.com. It's
> >> just
> >> > > one
> >> > > > > > page,
> >> > > > > > > > so
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > viewing the source will reveal any and all of my
> >> code
> >> > > > > > besides
> >> > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unaltered javascript libraries.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance!
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > "Make everything as simple as possible, but not
> >> > > simpler."
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > > > > > ---
> >> > > > > > > > > > > "Make everything as simple as possible, but not
> >> simpler."
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
>
> >> > > > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > > > ---
> >> > > > > > > > > "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
>
> >> > > > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
>
> >> > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > ---
> >> > > > > > > "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
>
> >> > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
>
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > ---
> >> > > > > "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
>
> >> > > > > - Albert Einstein
>
> >> > --
> >> > ---
> >> > "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
>
> >> > - Albert Einstein
>
> > --
> > ---
> > "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
>
> > - Albert Einstein

Reply via email to