So weird....

I'm so close!

It seems the transition works, EXCEPT for on the links on the first
page.  All of the others work just fine.  Although I can't seem to
find anything different between the code on each page other than the
id names.

I'm still investigating, but if anyone sees something that I don't,
please please let me know.

Ami

On Dec 23, 11:49 am, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ami,
>
> I have to run, but I found out that if I apply the effect on another
> element:
> var myFxa1 = new Fx.Tween(document.id('demo-inner', {
>   duration: 'long',
>   fps: 40 }));
>
> var myFxb1 = new Fx.Tween(document.id('demo-inner', {
>   duration: 'long',
>   fps: 40 }));
>
> $('link3-2').addEvent('click', function(event) {
>     event.stop();
>     myFxa1.start('left', -100);
>     myFxb1.start('top', -100);
>
> });
>
> It worked (this element is the "about" button in your page after the -1200,
> -1200 transition.
> My guess is that you applied some code on top of the new two Fx instances on
> the "link-1", "link-2" etc.. (maybe even one of the classes they share..)
>
> Check it out and let me know!
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Ami <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It was "sine,"  haha.  That was a typo...
>
> > On Dec 23, 11:19 am, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I don't think "cine" is a valid transition.
>
> > >http://mootools.net/docs/core/Fx/Fx.Transitions
>
> > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Roman Land <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi Ami,
>
> > > > It seems that there is a bug with the "cine:in" transition you chose to
> > > > use, I tried it without a specified transition and it worked nicely in
> > IE8.
> > > > Otherwise you could open a ticket in lighthouse (I dont have the exact
> > > > link, you could find it in other posts) to get that looked at by the
> > > > MooTools developers!
>
> > > > Enjoy
> > > > -- Roman
>
> > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Ami <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> Hey Roman,
>
> > > >> Sorry for taking so long to update.  I got caught up in other
> > > >> projects...
>
> > > >> So, I've finally implemented all of the settings, and Firefox is
> > > >> beautiful as usual, but now I don't even get a tween effect in IE7.
> > > >> It just "jumps" to the new position despite all of the settings.
>
> > > >> If you'd like, you can check out what I've done at
> > > >>http://www.3wayevents.com/index_ie.html.
>
> > > >> Any ideas??
>
> > > >> Ami
> > > >> On Dec 18, 11:19 am, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Thats great!
>
> > > >> > Sure you can, when you init the fx use any of the options:
>
> > > >> > var _myFx1 = new Fx.Tween(document.id('wrapper'), {
> > > >> >   // place here any of the options you would otherwise
> > > >> >   duration: 'long',
> > > >> >   transition: 'sine:in',
> > > >> >   fps: 40
>
> > > >> > })
> > > >> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Ami <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > > Alright, attempted to implement the absolute positioning
> > method...and
> > > >> > > it almost works. :)
>
> > > >> > > In firefox the transition is smooth, but in IE the div just
> > "jumps" to
> > > >> > > the position specified.  Is there any way to set a duration, or
> > fps
> > > >> > > for this like you can for Fx.Scroll?  It's really important that
> > you
> > > >> > > be able to see the images etc. in the transition between pages.
>
> > > >> > > You can see what I'm talking about athttp://
> > > >> 3wayevents.com/index_ie.html
>
> > > >> > > On Dec 17, 7:28 pm, Ami <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > I'm headed out of the office right now but will try it first
> > thing
> > > >> > > > tomorrow morning and keep you posted.  Thanks so so much, again,
> > all
> > > >> > > > of the help is much appreciated.
>
> > > >> > > > On Dec 17, 6:58 pm, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > > > > Never tried that plugin.. did you try the absolute
> > positioning?
> > > >> its
> > > >> > > easier
> > > >> > > > > to integrate
>
> > > >> > > > > If I have time tomorrow I will look into this plugin and try
> > to
> > > >> help
> > > >> > > you.
>
> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Ami <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > Attempted to implement SmoothScroll, but it broke all of the
> > > >> links.
>
> > > >> > > > > > What I'm gathering from the docs is that SmoothScroll
> > doesn't
> > > >> work
> > > >> > > > > > with elements, right?  I'd have to restructure the site?
>
> > > >> > > > > > On Dec 17, 6:12 pm, Roman Land <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > Tried it with your site but I am getting the same results.
>
> > > >> > > > > > > Did you try the smoothscroll plugin?
> > > >> > > > > >http://mootools.net/docs/more/Fx/Fx.SmoothScroll
>
> > > >> > > > > > > HTH
>
> > > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Ami <
> > [email protected]>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > Nope, I haven't tried that.  Bear with me for a second
> > here,
> > > >> > > because
> > > >> > > > > > > > I'm still relatively new to this, what code would I
> > change
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > make
> > > >> > > > > > > > that work?
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 5:31 pm, Roman Land <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > if I recall correctly I had better performance with
> > > >> absolute
> > > >> > > > > > positioning
> > > >> > > > > > > > > (with left: (n)px top: (n)px) instead of using offset
> > with
> > > >> FX,
> > > >> > > I cant
> > > >> > > > > > > > > explain it but it helped. (maybe the browser renders
> > > >> absolute
> > > >> > > > > > position
> > > >> > > > > > > > > movement better then offset..
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Let me know if you've tried it!
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Ami <
> > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Nope...this problem was happening before any of
> > those
> > > >> scripts
> > > >> > > were
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > added, unfortunately.
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > I ended up having to give up on it for a while for
> > times
> > > >> sake
> > > >> > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > finish out the site despite the weird issue.  >.<
> > > >>  Sorry.
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks so much for trying to help, you're the first
> > and
> > > >> only
> > > >> > > one so
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > far (across 3 different forums).  Any other possible
> > > >> tricks
> > > >> > > up your
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > sleeve?
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 5:17 pm, Roman Land <
> > [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > You could try (for testing at least) removing
> > tracking
> > > >> > > scripts
> > > >> > > > > > you
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > included
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > (google and some other ones), I see in their code
> > that
> > > >> they
> > > >> > > are
> > > >> > > > > > > > watching
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > for
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > events
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Ami <
> > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > No luck.  :(  Tried lower (all the way down to 1
> > > >> fps) and
> > > >> > > > > > higher
> > > >> > > > > > > > (all
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > the way to 1500fps) and it changes frequency,
> > but
> > > >> it's
> > > >> > > still
> > > >> > > > > > very
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > obvious.
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ...Any other ideas?
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > This is so strange!!
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 4:22 pm, Roman Land <
> > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your code looks good (except maybe that you
> > are
> > > >> > > creating new
> > > >> > > > > > > > event to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > stop
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > bubling... but that does effect the scrolling
> > > >> issue).
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I would try playing with the FPS valuehttp://
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >www.docs.mootools.net/docs/core/Fx/Fx
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > My guess that a lower value (default 50) will
> > > >> resolve
> > > >> > > this
> > > >> > > > > > issue,
> > > >> > > > > > > > but
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > maybe
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > a higher one :)
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Please update if this helped..
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Ami <
> > > >> > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help! I'm at my wits end trying to
> > figure
> > > >> this
> > > >> > > out.
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I used the Fx.Scroll effect on a website I
> > > >> recently
> > > >> > > > > > developed,
> > > >> > > > > > > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > it
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > works beautifully in Firefox, but on every
> > > >> version of
> > > >> > > IE
> > > >> > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > effect
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shaky and a little nauseating to watch. Can
> > > >> anyone
> > > >> > > give me
> > > >> > > > > > some
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > sort
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of clue as to why this happens and what I
> > can do
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > fix it?
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've tried removing all the images (its a
> > very
> > > >> image
> > > >> > > heavy
> > > >> > > > > > > > site),
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > as
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > well as removing the other scripts I have
> > > >> running on
> > > >> > > the
> > > >> > > > > > same
> > > >> > > > > > > > page,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > all to no avail.
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The site URL ishttp://www.3wayevents.com.
> > It's
> > > >> just
> > > >> > > one
> > > >> > > > > > page,
> > > >> > > > > > > > so
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > viewing the source will reveal any and all
> > of my
> > > >> code
> > > >> > > > > > besides
> > > >> > > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unaltered javascript libraries.
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance!
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > "Make everything as simple as possible, but
> > not
> > > >> > > simpler."
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > "Make everything as simple as possible, but not
> > > >> simpler."
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > --
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Reply via email to