basically, cloning an element leaves behind events and storage. there's a cloneEvents method but no cloneStorage.
This is relatively easy the element storage runs inside of a closure, so -core would need to be modified (I can't think of a way of accessing the get function and .the storage object as is) do you think it's a feature worth including - i bumped into this problem the other day? cheers -- Dimitar Christoff <[email protected]> - http://fragged.org/
