Hes talking about store/retrieve. Maybe if i use retrieve with no args it could grab all the stored keys on that element.
-- Fábio Miranda Costa Solucione Sistemas Engenheiro de interfaces On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > Storage is too generic. What does it meant to clone it? If I have an > element with an array stored on it, do we copy the array? Or do the two > elements share it? What if a class is stored on the element, like > Form.Validator. We can't just copy the object and expect it to work. What if > a DOM element is stored? Do we clone it too? > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Dimitar Christoff <[email protected]>wrote: > >> basically, cloning an element leaves behind events and storage. there's >> a cloneEvents method but no cloneStorage. >> >> This is relatively easy the element storage runs inside of a closure, so >> -core would need to be modified (I can't think of a way of accessing the >> get function and .the storage object as is) >> >> do you think it's a feature worth including - i bumped into this problem >> the other day? >> >> cheers >> -- >> Dimitar Christoff <[email protected]> - http://fragged.org/ >> >> >
