I couldnt replicate the issue... :(

Its really hard to investigate the issue without a testing environment,
please try to isolate the offending code in mooshell and try to replicate
the issue there.

Wish I could help you more..
-- Roman

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:26 PM, mmjaeger <[email protected]> wrote:

> no, I don't
>
> On Feb 2, 12:27 am, Barry van Oudtshoorn <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > You're not running through a proxy that's fiddling with the data, are
> you?
> >
> > On 2/02/2010 11:45 AM, mmjaeger wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > After hours of playing around with the code above, I still couldn't
> > > get it to work - sometime it works, sometimes it doesn't - IE 8 shows
> > > an "Access denied error" once in a while - the request object gets
> > > properly created - it fails when trying to start the request with
> > > this.jsonRequest.startTimer(this.params);
> >
> > > I've no idea what else to try and what could cause this issue - what
> > > seems to help sometimes is to empty the cache of my CMS?!
> >
> > > On Feb 1, 12:13 pm, mmjaeger<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >> by the way, this is the request function:
> >
> > >> request: function() { // get track information
> > >>                  this.params = new Hash({
> > >>                          'host':         this.options.host,
> > >>                      'port':     this.options.port,
> > >>                          'limit':        this.options.limit,
> > >>                          'covers':       this.options.covers,
> > >>                          'title':        this.options.track
> > >>                  });
> >
> > >>                  this.jsonRequest = new Request.JSON({
> > >>                      method:                     'post',
> > >>                      url:                        this.options.path,
> > >>                      initialDelay:       0,
> > >>                      delay:                      this.options.delay,
> > >>                      limit:                      90000,
> > >>                      noCache:            true,
> > >>                      link:                       'chain',
> > >>                      onRequest:          function() {
> > >>                          if (this.options.loader)
> this.loaderEl.show();
> > >>                      }.bind(this),
> > >>                      onSuccess: function(items) {
> > >>                          // checks
> > >>                                  if (!this.itemsAreValid(items))
> return false; // invalid response
> > >> or request timed out
> > >>                          if (!this.itemsNeedUpdate(items)) return
> false; // time has not
> > >> changed - no updated needed
> > >>                          // reset tables
> > >>                          this.tblTracklist               = null;
> > >>                          this.tblTracklistExt    = null;
> >
> > >>                          // process items
> > >>                          items.each(function(item, idx) {
> > >>                                  if (!$defined(item.track)) return
> false;
> > >>                                  this.processItems(item, idx);
> > >>                          }.bind(this));
> >
> > >>                          this.fireEvent('onCallback')
> > >>                      }.bind(this),
> > >>                          onComplete: function() {
> > >>                          if (this.options.loader)
> this.loaderEl.hide();
> > >>                      }.bind(this)
> > >>                  });
> >
> > >>                  this.options.track ?
> this.jsonRequest.post(this.params) :
> > >> this.jsonRequest.startTimer(this.params);
> > >>          },
> >
> > >> On Feb 1, 11:29 am, Roman Land<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >>> Hmm.. Could you use the IE developer tools and tell us what are the
> > >>> variables in the function during this run?
> >
> > >>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:42 PM, mmjaeger<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>> IE seem to refer to this line in the core file: this.xhr.open
> > >>>> (method.toUpperCase(), url, this.options.async);
> >
> > >>>> On Feb 1, 10:24 am, mmjaeger<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> changed the file permissions - unfortunately, didn't make a
> > >>>>> difference.
> >
> > >>>>> On Feb 1, 9:45 am, mmjaeger<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>> the js file seem to be set to 644?!
> >
> > >>>>>> On Feb 1, 9:11 am, Paul Saukas<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>> Does it run all the time for you ? and not at all for clients ?
>  Have
> >
> > >>>> you
> >
> > >>>>>>> checked the permissions on the file ? Unix can have issues where
> a
> >
> > >>>> new file
> >
> > >>>>>>> is uploaded or moved and acquires unwanted permissions. try chmod
> the
> >
> > >>>> file
> >
> > >>>>>>> to 775 and see if that helps .
> >
> > >>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Roman Land<[email protected]
> >
> >
> > >>>> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Send the screen shot if you can
> >
> > >>>>>>>> נשלח מהאייפון שלי.
> >
> > >>>>>>>> On 01/02/2010, at 02:27, mmjaeger<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> Hello
> > >>>>>>>>> I'm having a mootools class that sometimes gets executed and
> >
> > >>>> sometimes
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> it is not - It's supposed to run every time - no errors -
> neither
> >
> > >>>> in
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> Safari nor in Firefox - I client of mine sent me a IE8
> screenshot
> >
> > >>>> that
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> basically says "Access denied" - it's referring to mootools
> core
> >
> > >>>> - I
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> never got that when trying in IE8.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> I don't really now where to start debugging - any ideas are
> >
> > >>>> welcomed.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> Do js files need a certain permission on a unix server?
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> Safari drops a few warning like: Resource interpreted as other
> >
> > >>>> but
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> transferred with MIME type text/javascript.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> any ideas where those are coming from?
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> Thank you in advance for your input.
> >
> > >>> --
> > >>> ---
> > >>> "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
> >
> > >>> - Albert Einstein
>



-- 
---
"Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."

- Albert Einstein

Reply via email to