I know resources is usually the biggest bottleneck.  That is one reason for
even bringing it up and apparently I probably should not have.



On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote:

> The biggest thing slowing down the release of a complete UI framework is
> resources. If you want to get involved then by all means, jump in! If you
> want to work on ART, fork, pull, contribute, push, pull request. MooTools
> and its related projects don't happen by magic. If you want something to
> happen, the best thing you can do is contribute your time.
>
> 2010/2/12 Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]>
>
> yeah me too, im not happy with any of them.
>> But there are plans to make mooArt like the official ui for mootools. I
>> think it wont include "everything" like some of the uis out tehre include,
>> it will just include the base to make your own components in an easy,
>> organized and beautiful way.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fábio Miranda Costa
>> Solucione Sistemas
>> Engenheiro de interfaces
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> If you like some, build your own that uses what you like :)
>>>
>>> These frameworks are fine for on-demand, but I feel that I need to design
>>> my own UI components as I wasnt happy with JQuery UI or Moocha UI or any
>>> other UI framework, until I built my own..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Trevor Orr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> After seeing some of the cool Mootools built UI Frameworks lately,
>>>> JxLib, MochaUI, MooLego, Mootools ART and probably others.
>>>>
>>>> I just came up with a pipe dream idea, to make the Mootools library even
>>>> more kick ass than it already is why not take these different UI libraries
>>>> and combine them all into one very cool UI framework?
>>>>
>>>> Don't blast me for this one, like I said it's a pipe dream.  There are
>>>> pieces of each of these libraries that I really like.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
>>>
>>> - Albert Einstein
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to