It's more powerfully, true. It's more complicated, true. jQuery people are mostly folks with zero JavaScript experience, and that's simply not our target. We want to have at least intermediate developers on our side.
The Slick-enabled version of MooTools wasn't given enough publicity since it's still a beta – hopefully there's going to be PR after the release of a stable 1.3. On 26 May 2010, at 07:55, jiggliemon wrote: > http://www.google.com/trends?q=jquery%2C+mootools > > How can Mootools stats be dropping? It's clearly a more powerful > framework (or even just a framework). Wouldn't the Query heads get > tired of the restrictions and redundancy, and jump ship for something > more extensible? > > I get the merits of jQuery, I even use it every day. But on that > token; I'd rather be using mootools. > > Do we need to get a PR agent?
