Yes I was talking about jquery webpage . +2 points to Ryan answer.
There is a think I want to remark, mootols website distribution Is perfect for me, but look more like plaintext page, than a 21 century webpage. Useful? yes, Beauty? No Anyway, I love mootols as it is, the important thing is the code. On 26 mayo, 16:58, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > So, you're saying we should go back and call it *My Object Oriented > Tools*instead of the current "abbreviation". > > I wouldn't mind if the logo had the definition of "moo" underneath. > > ___ > > Oskar Krawczykhttp://nouincolor.com > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:53 PM, TimeImp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Another thing to think about is the name of the actual JS framework/ > > library. > > Eg: a FW/Lib named BigDoor will probably be more remembered than > > something like SmallHandle because when people think door, they think > > wood, timber, building, moving thing. But SmallHandle could mean a > > handle for a door, a ladder or something completely unrelated. > > In this way, I believe that more people are using jQuery because of > > this thinking: it has the word QUERY in there, and that is often > > associated by programming-illiterate people as computer code. > > But mootools [as cool as it sounds] does not have this direct link to > > computer programming. To a person who programs all manner of non-web- > > related things, mootools, when first proposed to them, may sound far- > > fetched and, in some ways, stupid and immature [the name, not the > > framework/library]. > > > It might even cause them to think of Cows or Milk instead of JS code > > and simplifying your life. > > > So theres a POV from someone who advertises mootools at the workplace > > but gets funny looks until an explanation is told.
