Side Note: When you use the flash uploader method (FancyUpload) you get the added benefit of having a real-time progress indicator. An iFrame doesn't give you that benefit.
The only drawback of using the "Flash" method that I've really experienced, is that there's been two Flash plugin versions that have broken various classes and functionality. So if you're working on a client project, beware future plugin revisions, and expect some panicy phone calls. -Chase On Jun 26, 10:37 pm, brook <[email protected]> wrote: > thanks for the links! > > On Jun 27, 1:28 am, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > 2) i´m looking through thishttp://valums.com/ajax-upload/ right > > > now ... trying to understand how it works... and i guess its not using > > > xhr but there certainly seems to be a work around out there > > > It uses IFRAME as chone already suggested. > > > An ideal class would use PE to detect when HTML 5 File API and > > attendant features can be used instead. It wouldn't make much sense to > > build a class today that can't adapt to true AJAX if available. > > > See: > > >http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/https://developer.mozilla.org/e... > > etc. > > > -- Sandy
