yeah progress indicators are nice...i guess my big issue is that one of the projects i´m working on is going to need to allow uploads from iphones/pads ... i could go with sandy´s suggestion and then have a flash or fancy upload back up. hmmm...
in the end going with the original suggestion of using iframe probably fits best for this job but its not working the way i expect it too. hopefully tomorrow i´ll have more luck. .b On Jun 27, 2:20 am, jiggliemon <[email protected]> wrote: > Side Note: > When you use the flash uploader method (FancyUpload) you get the added > benefit of having a real-time progress indicator. An iFrame doesn't > give you that benefit. > > The only drawback of using the "Flash" method that I've really > experienced, is that there's been two Flash plugin versions that have > broken various classes and functionality. So if you're working on a > client project, beware future plugin revisions, and expect some panicy > phone calls. > > -Chase > > On Jun 26, 10:37 pm, brook <[email protected]> wrote: > > > thanks for the links! > > > On Jun 27, 1:28 am, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > 2) i´m looking through thishttp://valums.com/ajax-upload/ right > > > > now ... trying to understand how it works... and i guess its not using > > > > xhr but there certainly seems to be a work around out there > > > > It uses IFRAME as chone already suggested. > > > > An ideal class would use PE to detect when HTML 5 File API and > > > attendant features can be used instead. It wouldn't make much sense to > > > build a class today that can't adapt to true AJAX if available. > > > > See: > > > >http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/https://developer.mozilla.org/e... > > > etc. > > > > -- Sandy
