No, I mean it. :) I was rather thinking about something like this: http://www.jsfiddle.net/ZNaeY/1/
On 9 Paź, 11:56, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > Haha, yeah, it's like using eval() - you just don't do it ;) > > But seriously, what I did so far is, on load/resize, I check how many images > fit in one screen, store this value as perPage, then just go from there - it > seems to do the trick. > > I'm getting there. Will share my final script here... If it's working or not. > > On 2010-10-09, at 11:44, Robert wrote: > > > > > Hmm, I love cheating, so I would just scroll to the image which is > > under "next" button ;) > > If You use propagation, You actually click on it... > > > ;) > > > Actually after some advanced projects I tend to depend on math and > > position arithmetics less and less... > > > On 9 Paź, 10:28, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey folks, > > >> I wanted to create something similar > >> tohttp://fastflip.googlelabs.com/?source=news, at first it seems like a > >> simple side-scroller but there's one feature here I don't know how to get > >> working - basically when you click NEXT or PREVIOUS the scroller aligns > >> the left side to the image from the next page (or the one that was partly > >> shown). Try resizing the window, and clicking NEXT - it'll always scroll > >> to the item that's half-shown (on the right). > > >> How would you go about and do it? > > >> My original idea was to filter an element collection for the first element > >> that getPosition().x returns a higher value than the container's width > >> itself... This proven to be working, but it get's more complicated when we > >> start thinking about the second page... There would be a lot of > >> storing/reading and looping to get this working. So it seems like this > >> isn't the way to go... > > >> This is what I have so far -http://www.jsfiddle.net/oskar/nBu2Z/ > > >> Any ideas? > > >> Oskar
