Careful, it is not working with 1.3, even with compatibility layer:
http://www.jsfiddle.net/ZNaeY/7/

Funny "dancing" effect, btw.

On Oct 9, 10:10 pm, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry was whole day out.
> Is this What You are looking for?
>
> http://www.jsfiddle.net/ZNaeY/3/
>
> On 9 Paź, 14:34, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > No, I mean it. :)
> > I was rather thinking about something like 
> > this:http://www.jsfiddle.net/ZNaeY/1/
>
> > On 9 Paź, 11:56, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Haha, yeah, it's like using eval() - you just don't do it ;)
>
> > > But seriously, what I did so far is, on load/resize, I check how many 
> > > images fit in one screen, store this value as perPage, then just go from 
> > > there - it seems to do the trick.
>
> > > I'm getting there. Will share my final script here... If it's working or 
> > > not.
>
> > > On 2010-10-09, at 11:44, Robert wrote:
>
> > > > Hmm, I love cheating, so I would just scroll to the image which is
> > > > under "next" button ;)
> > > > If You use propagation, You actually click on it...
>
> > > > ;)
>
> > > > Actually after some advanced projects I tend to depend on math and
> > > > position arithmetics less and less...
>
> > > > On 9 Paź, 10:28, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> Hey folks,
>
> > > >> I wanted to create something similar 
> > > >> tohttp://fastflip.googlelabs.com/?source=news, at first it seems like 
> > > >> a simple side-scroller but there's one feature here I don't know how 
> > > >> to get working - basically when you click NEXT or PREVIOUS the 
> > > >> scroller aligns the left side to the image from the next page (or the 
> > > >> one that was partly shown). Try resizing the window, and clicking NEXT 
> > > >> - it'll always scroll to the item that's half-shown (on the right).
>
> > > >> How would you go about and do it?
>
> > > >> My original idea was to filter an element collection for the first 
> > > >> element that getPosition().x returns a higher value than the 
> > > >> container's width itself... This proven to be working, but it get's 
> > > >> more complicated when we start thinking about the second page... There 
> > > >> would be a lot of storing/reading and looping to get this working. So 
> > > >> it seems like this isn't the way to go...
>
> > > >> This is what I have so far -http://www.jsfiddle.net/oskar/nBu2Z/
>
> > > >> Any ideas?
>
> > > >> Oskar

Reply via email to