Hi! Thanks for your reply. But actually the example you provided uses some methods of mootools 1.2, so it fails with 1.3. But probably puremvc itself is compatible with 1.3. I will try to examine it today.
On 8 November 2010 17:12, André Fiedler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! Works only with 1.3 in compat mode. > See: http://jsfiddle.net/SunboX/B6H8f/ > > 2010/11/8 Maxim Lacrima <[email protected]> >> >> On 8 November 2010 16:17, Olivier El Mekki <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > Do you guys use mvc in your code? >> > >> >> I joined MooTools community several days ago. I am currently exploring >> Mootools API and searching for tools that can help me in my project. >> My main language is Python and I have used python port of PureMVC >> framework for some desktop projects. Now I want to try javascript port >> of PureMVC, which actually is based on MooTools, but it was released 9 >> months ago and I am not sure that it is compatible with 1.3... If >> someone more experienced than me could take a look on it to check if >> it is compatible with 1.3 I would be very thankful! >> PureMVC JS site: http://trac.puremvc.org/PureMVC_JS/ >> >> >> >> >> > I used it several times for big js apps, typically putting the ajax >> > requests and data parsing/transformation in models, the events in >> > controllers and dom manipulation in views. >> > >> > On my current project, I argued we do not need mvc since it was mostly a >> > collection of widgets, each having a couple of events and dom >> > manipulation. >> > >> > I was said that the application may become way more complex then, and >> > that I should consider the extendable part of the thing while >> > implementing it. >> > >> > At this point, I remembered there was such debate when backend language >> > frameworks became popular, with some people saying mvc was a pattern and >> > as such should only be implemented when the project requires it. >> > >> > Clearly (imo), webapps have greatly took advantage of systematic >> > implementation of mvc, turning it into something that is way more than a >> > pattern among others. >> > >> > In the era of minification, we can afford writing a bit more of code to >> > have it more organized ( that's quite what moootools is about comparing >> > to others libs, anyway ). >> > >> > Do you think mootools, and javascript in general, could take advantage >> > of systematic mvc? >> > >> > -- >> > Olivier El Mekki. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> with regards, >> Maxim > > -- with regards, Maxim
