Does it? I tried to convert all instances of 1.2 methods to 1.3. It's currently working in my personal app with 1.3 no-compat...
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Maxim Lacrima <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for your reply. But actually the example you provided uses some > methods of mootools 1.2, so it fails with 1.3. But probably puremvc > itself is compatible with 1.3. I will try to examine it today. > > On 8 November 2010 17:12, André Fiedler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi! Works only with 1.3 in compat mode. > > See: http://jsfiddle.net/SunboX/B6H8f/ > > > > 2010/11/8 Maxim Lacrima <[email protected]> > >> > >> On 8 November 2010 16:17, Olivier El Mekki <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > Do you guys use mvc in your code? > >> > > >> > >> I joined MooTools community several days ago. I am currently exploring > >> Mootools API and searching for tools that can help me in my project. > >> My main language is Python and I have used python port of PureMVC > >> framework for some desktop projects. Now I want to try javascript port > >> of PureMVC, which actually is based on MooTools, but it was released 9 > >> months ago and I am not sure that it is compatible with 1.3... If > >> someone more experienced than me could take a look on it to check if > >> it is compatible with 1.3 I would be very thankful! > >> PureMVC JS site: http://trac.puremvc.org/PureMVC_JS/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I used it several times for big js apps, typically putting the ajax > >> > requests and data parsing/transformation in models, the events in > >> > controllers and dom manipulation in views. > >> > > >> > On my current project, I argued we do not need mvc since it was mostly > a > >> > collection of widgets, each having a couple of events and dom > >> > manipulation. > >> > > >> > I was said that the application may become way more complex then, and > >> > that I should consider the extendable part of the thing while > >> > implementing it. > >> > > >> > At this point, I remembered there was such debate when backend > language > >> > frameworks became popular, with some people saying mvc was a pattern > and > >> > as such should only be implemented when the project requires it. > >> > > >> > Clearly (imo), webapps have greatly took advantage of systematic > >> > implementation of mvc, turning it into something that is way more than > a > >> > pattern among others. > >> > > >> > In the era of minification, we can afford writing a bit more of code > to > >> > have it more organized ( that's quite what moootools is about > comparing > >> > to others libs, anyway ). > >> > > >> > Do you think mootools, and javascript in general, could take advantage > >> > of systematic mvc? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Olivier El Mekki. > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> with regards, > >> Maxim > > > > > > > > -- > with regards, > Maxim >
