Lolnewb for doing it exactly the way fx.tween did. Gimme a break. Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Christoph Pojer <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, but it also means that you used a bad coding style (getters that > act as setters, wtf?) :P In any case, it is our fault for even > providing such an API. This change was really intended to make the > code you write with MooTools even more expressive. > > On Nov 21, 7:32 pm, Ryan Florence <[email protected]> wrote: >> Getters not setting broke several of my classes, so it does require >> additional work in some cases even if it "shouldn't" >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Nov 21, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> It really shouldn't require any additional work. >> >>> On 2010-11-21, at 18:04, Vic wrote: >> >>>> Thank you Christoph, >> >>>> I have upgraded using the compatibillity layer, still this requires >>>> some extra work with some of the plugins, but indeed is less painfull >>>> than I imagined this way, thanks for all the hard work to all the >>>> MooTools team-members! >> >>>> Vic >> >>>> On Nov 21, 12:16 pm, Christoph Pojer <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Alternatively, if it is just about data-properties you can also just >>>>> put this after mootools core and before your own code: >> >>>>> Selectors.RegExps.combined = (/\.([\w-]+)|\[([\w-]+)(?:([!*^$~|]?=) >>>>> (["']?)([^\4]*?)\4)?\]|:([\w-]+)(?:\(["']?(.*?)?["']?\)|$)/g); >> >>>>> However, I'd advice you to upgrade to 1.3. It is easy and painless and >>>>> brings you a lot more new features. >> >>>>> On Nov 21, 12:13 pm, Vic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>> Thank you Oskar, I will look into both options. >> >>>>>> On Nov 21, 12:05 pm, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Ah, I see, yes, you're right. >> >>>>>>> Well you've got two solutions here: >> >>>>>>> 1. Use Slick with 1.2.5 using @cpojer's solution >>>>>>> -https://gist.github.com/361474 >>>>>>> 2. Use 1.3-compat so your 1.2 scripts work AND you get all the new 1.3 >>>>>>> awesomeness >> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Oskar >> >>>>>>> On 2010-11-21, at 11:55, Vic wrote: >> >>>>>>>> I know, but that IS the problem, see this updated version: >>>>>>>> http://jsfiddle.net/victor/AWfeD/1/ >> >>>>>>>> it should only target the last div, because both selectors target the >>>>>>>> 'second' div >> >>>>>>>> On Nov 21, 11:01 am, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Works fine in 1.2.5 as well. >> >>>>>>>>> Your example adds colors to both divs, the top one and the bottom. >> >>>>>>>>> On 2010-11-21, at 10:55, Vic wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> I now see that it does work correctly in MooTools 1.3, must have >>>>>>>>>> something to do with slick? Still I would love to be able to do this >>>>>>>>>> in my 1.2.4 code as well. This particular project cannot upgrade yet. >> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 21, 10:37 am, Vic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>>>>>>> Is it correct that (MooTools 1.2.4/1.2.5) cannot succesfully select >>>>>>>>>>> elements using css selectors by matching on custom data-* >>>>>>>>>>> attributes? >>>>>>>>>>> If I use the 'rel' or 'class' attribute the correct element gets >>>>>>>>>>> selected, but I would like to be able to use the data-* attributes >> >>>>>>>>>>> View the example here: http://jsfiddle.net/AWfeD/ >> >>>>>>>>>>> any ideas? thank you
