There's a problem. Explorer. As always.
Yes Slick.search is good in ff.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<regioni>
<regione>
<nome>argentina</nome>
<id>22</id>
</regione>
<regione>
<nome>australia</nome>
<id>23</id>
</regione>
</regioni>
Slick.search(xml,'regione')[0].getElement('nome').get('text'); //ok in
ff!!!!
BUT, explorer stops at .getElement. In general, explorer doesn't
understand the Element methods.
Is there a way to solve this issue?
On 24 Nov, 17:36, אריה גלזר <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:34 PM, stratboy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > But how can I pass the xml document to $$?
>
> > On 24 Nov, 17:09, Ryan Florence <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > $$ = Slick.search(document, selector);
>
> Slick.seach(xml,selector);
>
>
>
> > > You can use either. As for documentation, just pass it a CSS selector
> > and you'll get your elements.
>
> > > On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:14 AM, stratboy wrote:
>
> > > > Excuse me for some reason I posted twice.
>
> > > > I wanted to make 2 more questions:
>
> > > > 1. The motools built in slick is v0.9, but the current version is 1.0.
>
> > > > console.log(Slick) -> Object { version="0.9dev"} etc..
>
> > > > So, should I use a stand alone Slick v1.0 instead of using the
> > > > mootools built in one ?
>
> > > > 2. If i use the built in, is there any mootools.slick - like prop that
> > > > references Slick? Or should I always use directly Slick?
>
> > > > Thank you
>
> > > > On 24 Nov, 15:19, ken <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> see Slick, it can parse any form of xml
>
> > > >> On Nov 24, 7:55 pm, stratboy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >>> Hi, I'm building a small app.
> > > >>> My php programmer will pass me some xml file. I was wandering if
> > maybe
> > > >>> Element is good even for parsing xml code.
> > > >>> Or maybe, is there any other (moo)tool for doing it?
>
> --
> Arieh Glazer
> אריה גלזר
> 052-5348-561
> 5561
