In both of those cases, Moo will be using `div1.appendChild(div2)`. The source code knows all. :)
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Philip Thompson <[email protected]>wrote: > I may have dreamed this up, but don't certain Element-manipulation methods > work more efficiently than others? For example, I used to use .adopt() a > lot, but now I use mainly .inject() because I thought it was more efficient. > > From: > document.id('div1').adopt(document.id('div2')); > > To: > document.id('div2').inject(document.id('div1')); > > Am I slightly nuts here? > > ~Philip > > http://lonestarlightandsound.com/ > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:39 PM, robarb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Excellent. Thanks very much. >> >> Rob >> >> On May 9, 11:07 am, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > It actually MOVES the element with no residue? >> > >> > Yes, any garbage collection is taken care of by the framework. >> > >> > -- S. >> > >
