hehehe
On May 10, 12:39 am, Sean McArthur <[email protected]> wrote: > In both of those cases, Moo will be using `div1.appendChild(div2)`. > > The source code knows all. :) > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Philip Thompson <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > I may have dreamed this up, but don't certain Element-manipulation methods > > work more efficiently than others? For example, I used to use .adopt() a > > lot, but now I use mainly .inject() because I thought it was more efficient. > > > From: > > document.id('div1').adopt(document.id('div2')); > > > To: > > document.id('div2').inject(document.id('div1')); > > > Am I slightly nuts here? > > > ~Philip > > >http://lonestarlightandsound.com/ > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:39 PM, robarb <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Excellent. Thanks very much. > > >> Rob > > >> On May 9, 11:07 am, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > It actually MOVES the element with no residue? > > >> > Yes, any garbage collection is taken care of by the framework. > > >> > -- S.
