found their error. server.js line 263 for var in without hasOwnProperty
check.

change to `if (seqFn.hasOwnProperty(i) && 'function' == typeof seqFn[i]) {`
and it works fine

On Friday, March 21, 2014, Dimitar Christoff <[email protected]> wrote:

> hrm - not sure. looks like a mootools extend is causing an issue in
> the way it's being used when Array.each is coming on..
>
> it's trying to implement the sparse [ undefined ] being passed in here
> forEach function Array() { [native code] } [ undefined ]
>
> /Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/mootools/lib/mootools-core-1.4.5-server.js:222
>         return method.apply(item, slice.call(arguments, 1));
>                       ^
> TypeError: #<XHR> is not a function
>     at Array.forEach (native)
>     at Function.implement [as forEach]
> (/Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/mootools/lib/mootools-core-1.4.5-server.js:222:17)
>     at Array.implement.each
> (/Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/mootools/lib/mootools-core-1.4.5-server.js:339:9)
>     at XHR.Socket.setupSendCallback
> (/Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/socket.js:264:21)
>     at XHR.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:126:20)
>     at XHR.Polling.onPollRequest
> (/Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/transports/polling.js:97:8
> )
>     at XHR.Polling.onRequest
> (/Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/transports/polling.js:53:10
> )
>     at XHR.onRequest
> (/Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/transports/polling-xhr.js:47:33
> )
>     at Server.handshake
> (/Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/server.js:232:13)
>     at Server.handleRequest
> (/Users/coda/temp/
> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/server.js:176:10)
>
> Process finished with exit code 1
>
> As an experiment, I replaced the mootools code with primish and it
> works fine... (`npm i primish` first)
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9d8140fbf69efc468638
>
> So he XHR object somewhere messes up - I may have time to look at it
> later but it does not sound like a mootools issue, probably it's
> passing through non-enumerables or something silly.
>
> On 21 March 2014 04:59, utan <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > Sure, no problem.. hope he figure what the problem is..
> >
> > If not then just let me know how to pass u credentials.
> >
> > --
> >
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "MooTools Users" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected] <javascript:;>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> Dimitar Christoff
>
> "JavaScript is to JAVA what hamster is to ham"
> @D_mitar - https://github.com/DimitarChristoff
>


-- 
Dimitar Christoff

"JavaScript is to JAVA what hamster is to ham"
@D_mitar - https://github.com/DimitarChristoff

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MooTools Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to