|
I agree enthusiastically. Any book on British Quads really needs to have a
fair amount of text. History. Artists. Periods. Types of printing and paper used
over the years. Distribution patterns. Possibly some interviews with prominent
sellers and collectors of quads as to trends in this area. Perhaps overview on
the field as to the rarity of some titles versus others which may be more
plentiful. etc. Pictures are great, but I can go to any one of 5 or 6
websites that specialize in quads and see tons of pictures any day of the week.
I would want a book to contain a lot of solid information that I wouldn't get
any other way.
I kind of feel that the reason Bruce opted to not have much text in his
books was because there has already been so much written about US posters and
the field in general that he would simply be wasting valuable page space
rehashing what has been said elsewhere. I don't particularly agree with this
choice, but it was his to make and understandable. Also, let's not forget that
most of Bruce's books -- except for a few specialized titles -- are actually
*catalogs* for his auctions and were intended primarily for that purpose.
-- JR
|
Title: Our own book
- Re: [MOPO] Our own book Phil Edwards Cinema Arts
- Re: [MOPO] Our own book Saul H. Chapman PhD
- Re: [MOPO] Our own book J R
- Re: [MOPO] Our own book Roger Kim
- Re: [MOPO] Our own book Shelly Whitworth-King

