Your post reminded me of a recent eBay purchase indicating the current sorry 
state of the hobby.

I recently bought a 1 sheet for "The Miracle Worker" for $9.99.  This is sad on 
many levels.

This is a true classic film in which both Ann Bancroft and Patty Duke won 
oscars. And the poster sells for less than $10.

The poster image is, in my opinion, awesome.  Its dramatic, powerful, and 
strikingly different from every other poster from the 60s (possibly ever).  And 
its $10.

I bought this from a seller who is not a regular poster dealer, in fact they 
are an eBay drop off store.  They take their cut, and the actual owner may get, 
what $5? Sad.

emovieposter.com sells this poster on occaision for between $4 and $48, with 
the last sale at $31 -- or 3 times what the occaisional seller gets.  We could 
argue for days about why.   Even so, sad.

The poster arrives, and it has an extra fold -- the seller, not having a 
correctly sized box, folds it over (not creasing it too badly), to fit in the 
available box.  This is very very sad.

So, I think about what to do -- return it? leave negative feedback? email the 
guy and give him a piece of my mind?  I decide to let it slide (its $10, and 
just not worth the hassle) -- so I forget about it.  Until today, when I got 
email from him requesting feedback -- which I promptly deleted.

Heres a link to an image of the poster (not mine):

http://carteles.metropoliglobal.com/paginas/pgrande.php?id=90313&caso=2

So here we sit surrounded by piles of beautiful paper, for classic films, with 
classic stars, almost all of which are basically worthless.

EvanZ (the original Evan on this list).

Movie trivia question: what do Patty Duke and Audrey Hepburn have in common?

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to