|
Before I go into detail I want to say that I hope
the following is taken as constructive criticism. These are simply my thoughts
as a potential bidder.
I have just had a look through the Bonhams
catalogue and one of the strange things that strikes me is that many of the
photos appear to have been cropped. A number of the photos do not appear
to show the complete poster - ie, the borders are not shown, and the printer
along with NSS details are not visible. You can't see if there is any
damage to the edges of the poster. The inevitable conclusion is that either the
poster has been trimmed or the image cropped. Even if it is only the image has
been cropped many of the posters have been linen backed and I would expect to be
able to see if the linen has been trimmed to the actual borders of the poster or
if a margin has been allowed.
I really cant understand why you would
not display the entire poster eg Lot No: 2112, or Lot No: 2118 or
Lot 2126 and more. It really is hard to bid on something when the
real condition is so difficult to determine. If you can't see the borders then
you really dont have a true indication of the condition of the poster. I know
this from bitter experience.
Have a look at Lot Number 2166. The borders are not
shown. Has it been trimmed? The poster is described as condition "B" but what
makes it B. You can't tell from the photo but if it is "B" then there must be
some defects. Describing a poster as A,B or C is not good enough for a major
auction. Defects should be clearly specified even if you use close up images
(read on for more on the way posters are photgraphed).
There are also lobby card lots in this auction
where only one lobby card is shown eg the Rebecca lobby card lot of
6 (incidentally, surely these are not original.) What are the other
cards in this lot? What makes them all condition "B". Its not much good showing
one card with a detailed image when there is no indication of the other cards or
their condition.
Lot No: 2076
Rebecca United Artists, 1940, six lobby cards, condition B.
This leads to another interesting subject. Have you
ever wondered why the photos of posters in auction catalogues always look so
perfect even when many are actually described as being in poor condition. In
many cases the reason is that the professional photographers who take the photos
for the auction houses often use a vacuum press to flatten out the poster before
it is photographed. This generally means that the foldlines and defects are
not as noticeable as they would be if you simply took a basic photo of a
folded poster without trying to flatten it out. Those MoPoers who are dealers
will know that in the amateur photographs that we take the foldlines are always
clearly visible.
Another concern surrounds the many posters
that have been linen backed in this auction. An example is
Lot No: 2177 The Wicked Lady
This has been simply described as:
"Universal, 1946, one-sheet, condition A-, linen-backed
41 x 27in".
The photo does not really help. I would be asking:
1. What was the condition of the poster prior to
backing.
2. Who did the backing. I'm sure we all know that there can
be a huge difference between the work of various backers.
3. Are there any defects that are still visible.
etc etc.
Once again, bitter experience has taught me that you cannot
assume that "A-" means that the poster has been professionally linen
backed.
Hopefully the points I have raised will be viewed as
constructive. I think it is important to be as accurate as possible with
descriptions and, ultimately, it will probably result in more bids and less
hassles for the seller.
What do you guys think?
Regards
John NEW Website: www.moviemem.com
JOHN REID VINTAGE MOVIE MEMORABILIA
PO Box 92 Palm Beach Qld 4221 Australia
|
- [MOPO] BONHAMS JOHN REID Vintage Movie Memorabilia
- Re: [MOPO] Bonhams Bruce Hershenson
- Re: [MOPO] Internet libel cou... JR
- Re: [MOPO] Internet libel cou... dsonesheets
- Re: [MOPO] Bonhams Greg Ferland
- Re: [MOPO] Bonhams Kirby McDaniel
- Re: [MOPO] Bonhams Bruce Hershenson

