Richie
I am only writing one email on this subject and I feel I have a
right as I am being flamed and blamed by you for something I did not start nor
end.
There is no rule on MoPo for emails off of MoPo. There cannot
be such a rule because it is not on MoPo. Your theory is so wrong it
is laughable. Scott Burns cannot make rules outside of MoPo. Emails
that occur between parties outside of MoPo are private and have nothing to do
with MoPo. Are you going to tell the group that I cannot discuss a MoPo
subject on my telephone, at a poster show, at an auction or anywhere else?
Your reasoning reeks of total nonsense and I am being polite with my
words. Don't they discuss MoPo on other discussion groups? Can Scott
Burns dictate to them about not discussing a MoPo topic? The bottom line
is--------on MoPo, Scott Burns rules because it is his. He cannot dictate
rules outside of MoPo regardless of where the situation originated. You
are repeating the words of a person who rationalizes everything towards meeting
her goals.
You began by saying I started it. Are you crazy? Do you
read all the emails in sequence or just pick and choose the ones you like?
Or do you read at random? Let me refresh or explain the sequence to
you.
1. JR and I were discussing rixposterz
listings.
2. Phil made a comment refuting JR's and my comments and then
ended his email with an insult to me.
3. I answered his insult on MoPo
(Up to now all words were on topic except the
insult)
4. Jeannie now entered with an insulting remark directed at
me
5. Since I did not want to get involved in a war on
MoPo and since she has tried to get me to engage in such a situation before, I
replied privately. I did not air it publicly and I have every right to do
this. If I did anything wrong then it is her right to take action
privately. She did not have a right to make a private email public and
Scott Burns said so. (Just to let you know, she tried to get me into a
debate on another talk group and I told her that I do not have the time like she
does. She emailed me back in a very sarcastic manner)
6. In repy to her taking the email public, I again replied
privately. she took it public again and stated she would continue to do so
in total defiance of Scott Burn's rules.
She insulted me publicly and that is the only thing that
counts. I did not attack anyone publicly and the fact that she made a
private email public is not my fault and not a violation of MoPo rules by
me. In fact, I just had a conversation about your email with another MoPo
member and the conversation has words about you that cannot be printed by David
K in his professional writings. Since both of us uttered words concerning
this topic which originated on MoPo, I ask you. Should we be suspended
from MoPo for a personal attack on you in a private conversation? What if
I wrote about your inane reasoning to Bruce and he published it in his email
club? Would it be a violation of MoPo rules if (and I say if) I wrote
that you were a ---- and Bruce published it? Come on now and get with
it.
You wrote "without a doubt" that I was wrong. I will not
publish a private email. I can only tell you that you are the only one
without a doubt. I can very easily print all the private emails I received
from MoPo members agreeing with me, applauding what I said privately and dissing
"you know who". I also did not receive a single private email telling me I
was wrong or agreeing with your "without a doubt" words.
There is also another thing you should do. Go to NSFGE and
read what is going on there. I was emailed (by a MoPo member) pages and
pages of her "discussions" with members there. She attacked our David
Lieberman and they call her The Kautix From Hell. She does nothing but
fight with others there.
You finally end your email with "do unto others as they do unto
you". You call me a hypocrite in the same email while quoting a righteous
way of living. Please explain to me how I can be insulted publicly and
that retorting privately is the same thing. Better yet, explain it to the
other members of MoPo.
What I find most ludicrous of all your words concerns your
statement about when someone wants to write something useful to the group they
should not be flamed. I believe I was writing something useful to the
group when I wrote about being truthful in ebay listings. I was insulted
by a person who has never written a useful thing on MoPo and you can verify
that by checking all her past emails. I reiterated in a private email and
you have the nerve to tell me I can't do that. Show me where the rules of
MoPo follow anyone beyond the borders of the site. Did you ever read the
First Amendment?
The only thing you said that was worth anything were your final
words -- "that's my two cents". You are correct because that's all they
are worth. Here are my final words to you-- that's my million
dollars - and I am worth much more than that.
Claude Litton
|
- Re: [MOPO] Is MoPo membership on a decline? Claude Litton
- Re: [MOPO] Is MoPo membership on a decline? Richard Halegua Comic Art
- Re: [MOPO] Is MoPo membership on a decline? Toochis Morin
- Re: [MOPO] Lenticular POster article - ... Tom Martin
- Re: [MOPO] Lenticular POster articl... Bob Brooks
- Re: [MOPO] Lenticular POster ar... Tom Martin