I have a question for some of you dealers (if any of you would even answer a
question like this):

Do you feel that you can "taint" a poster or cheapen it's actual value when
you list it high, get no bids and then drop (and continue to drop) the
price? (and I'm not talking about a take 10% off everything in our store
discount).

 

I've seen dealers here advertise posters for sale, get no bites and then
offer them again a few weeks later at 25% off, then a few weeks after that
at 25% off the lower price, etc, etc until sometime they end up offering the
poster at less than half of what their original asking price was.

I usually have two thoughts when I see this type of strategy:
1) If you were willing to sell the poster for "Z" instead of "X" or "Y",
then why not just start it at "Z" and let it run?

2) Dang, I wish I had that kind of mark-up on my posters that I could afford
to offer people 50%+ discounts and still be able to make money  (and if
anyone has any 30s-40s Universal Horror they'd like to sell for immediate
cash at 50%-80% of even Heritage's prices please let me know).

 

Then I end up wondering if by quickly reducing the price over a short period
of time you actually serve to drive away customers who may have been
otherwise interested in a piece.

I know situations may change, and there are lots of factors that go into the
pricing of a poster and how long you hold onto it before you feel the need
to dump it, (and I'm not against "high" prices per say, but if you ask a
high price shouldn't you be prepared to wait awhile for the right customer
to come along) but I'm just trying to gain some insight into the thought
process here.

 

Sean

 


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to