Soundtrack album posters were usually 22"x33" so they could fit in the record 
sleeve. This gave them similar proportions to a 1-sheet, though they were 
smaller than the standard 1-sheet size. Probably the best-known of these 
soundtrack LP posters is the one for Singin' in the Rain, which still 
occasionally turns up on eBay mis-identified as an original 1-sheet.

Dave
Posteropolis
www.posteropolis.com

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: McDaniel Kirby 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 10:48 AM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] High Socity Reprint question...


  I remember those records as "twofers" - gatefold albums with two or more 
films on each double album.  But I don't
  remember the posters.  Doubtful that  they would have been anywhere near the 
right size, anyway.


  Kirby McDaniel
  MovieArt Austin

  On Sep 14, 2008, at 701AM, Franc wrote:


    I have no specifics on this title but I believe MGM records reissued many 
of its classic MGM musical soundtrack albums in the 1970s and as a promotion 
included special reprint posters of the original one sheets with the record 
release. They were on different stock from the originals but I don't remember 
the size of the posters. In any case if you think the paper stock was different 
on the one sheet offerred to you, it's probably a reprint. FRANC
      -----Original Message-----
      From: MoPo List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Taranto
      Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 9:40 PM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: [MOPO] High Socity Reprint question...


      First off... Hope every one in Texas is doing OK after the big blow...

      Secondly,  I was offered a trade today for an original release High 
Society one sheet.  It wasn't folded and had no NSS number. Other than that all 
the printing on the bottom was correct for that poster.

      It was 27x40 1/2. It was obviously trimmed on the bottom as the trim was 
not as sharp as the other three sides. There was nothing indicating it was a 
reprint.

      I explained to him that I felt it was a reprint but he insisted that he 
worked at MGM and has had this poster since the mid-sixties and that it came 
from the president's office. He also claimed to have sold another exactly like 
it, unfolded. Another red flag I thought. Following all that the paper didn't 
feel right either.

      Anyone know of early reprints on this title or run across anything like 
this on this title before? I'd like to be honest with the guy and tell him 
exactly what he has.

      I would appreciate any comments.

      Many thanks,

      Glenn T.
      Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
      ___________________________________________________________________
      How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
      Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
      The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to