I have also noticed the NSS number is frequently the wrong font on some of 
these fake lobby cards, and the GAU and fine print does not stand up to strong 
magnification as Ron says. 

This also reveals a fine if somewhat murky moire effect on some titles 
(GOODFELLAS comes to mind in this respect). 

Some of these fake lobby cards and inserts haven been around now for several 
years.

Phil
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: MotionPictureArt.com 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:41 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] Interesting to see a minty white and a known original 
side by side!


  Hi Bruce and all others,
  This also applies to the minty white lobby card sets.
  However, on most of the minty white lobby cards the fine print is also less 
sharp. Is this also the case with these inserts?
  If indeed this is true then there is a way of spotting the fakes when you are 
buying stuff in person at shops or trade shows without the originals to compare 
them to.

  Ron 

  MotionPictureArt.com
  Movie Posters, Lobby Cards and more...
  http://www.MotionPictureArt.com
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Bruce Hershenson 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 1:26 PM
    Subject: [MOPO] Interesting to see a minty white and a known original side 
by side!


    I am currently auctioning inserts, and when I gathered up all the hundreds 
of inserts that I have been consigned, I discovered I had been sent FIVE 
different "Scarface" ones (the Pacino version). Close examination of them 
determined that four of them are "minty whites", the fake inserts that have 
polluted our hobby (see past MoPo e-mails or my E-Mail Club Archive or the LAMP 
site for more on these fakes).I will be returning those fake inserts to their 
owners, with the plea that they don't consign them to another auction (or put 
them on eBay). 

    But this was a great chance to look at the fakes very closely! Of course, 
they can be distinguished from the known original from their trademark "whiter 
than white" paper, and their glossier back side. But what is interesting to me 
is that when they are laid side by side, the lousy printing of the minty white 
becomes painfully obvious. They were clearly NOT printed from the original 
plates (as has sometime been speculated) but instead were made by photographing 
a known original, because the fine shadings in some areas are blurry or "filled 
in", as would be expected when you reproduce an original.

    Unfortunately, this would not jump out at most people when they solely look 
at the minty white fake. But when you look at BOTH the minty white fake and the 
proven original, those printing differences would be obvious to anyone (except 
maybe Professor Powers).

    Have the minty white fakes killed the value of the proven originals? The 
Scarface insert I am auctioning is currently at $246. so that is clearly not 
the case!

    Bruce
    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to