*On a rare piece like this, you can pretty much ask what ever you like
for it, without feeling ashamed. If I had the money, I would pay the 2
mil for it.
If you want to do the math, hike, % over the years, you can't! This is a
piece in a totally different league.
If one have a problem with pricing ( just like me ) on silly common
items, let's talk about that instead.
Holy grail it's priceless.
dario.
*
Richard Halegua Comic Art wrote:
I have a question for our members:
why is it so common that people on this board & others feel the need
to "thread crap" on people's items that are listed for sale???
It happens all to often and is almost always unjustified
For instance, the recent dumping on the CFTBL 1sheet that was listed
on fleaBay of which there was so much chat on these boards questioning
it's authenticity, even after Diane Jeffrey pointed out that she had
linenbacked the poster in question. The poster went unsold and you
have to wonder if the thread-crapping by certain members affected the
fellow's ability to sell his poster, and what for??
I have no argument with anyone who makes justified comments on
thieves, but ruining someone's reputation or ability to sell something
they own is really something that goes over the line.
Now I'm not saying that JR is ruining anything on Schacter's
Metropolis poster in particular. Largely because anyone interested in
that poster could care less what anyone on this board except a small
few advanced collectors might think, but I have no doubt that bashing
on some items (like the CFTBL 1sh) affects the sellers, and you have
to ask - "for what purpose?"
JR is a friend of mine, and I do believe it's his right to comment on
postings to this board like it is anyone else's right.. but there are
ways to disagree without being disagreeable and that's the difference
between _"thoughtful commentary"_ and _"thread crapping"_ and
honestly, I think JR is off base on this one and a tad over the line
Questioning the authenticity of the CFTBL poster should have begun by
questioning the seller directly, and getting the required information
to make justifiable comments. It should not begin by indicating
something is hinky. That's just poor journalism due to a lack of
understanding what the facts are. It's alot like Sarah Palin calling a
proposal to fund "end of life discussion with your doctor" a
Government "Death Panel".. It's a total crock of shit, and those posts
will follow that CFTBL poster around for some time. How can anyone
think that's right?? It's like the guy who gets called a pedophile and
is on the front page of every newspaper in America and then when the
facts reveal that the claim was a lie, the retraction is on page 23 in
small print. His life is ruined because of all the sewing circle
nannys who needed gossip.
To the Metropolis poster.. who can say what the poster is worth?? Or
who can say what Ken is justified in when profiting on his possession??
No question, the poster is very rare, although my understanding is
that there are more copies extant than the four he mentions in his
listing that are held in institutional collections. regardless, the
poster is what is referred to in art circles as _"priceless"_ just as
Todd's (and Borst's) copies of posters like Dracula. How do you
reliably price such gems that are in such short supply that only a
small few people around the world can own them??
Do I feel the poster is worth $2,000,000??
To be honest, I don't have an opinion on that factor. It belongs to
Ken, you can't find another if you try. He can ask whatever he feels
like asking. If someone wants to fork over $2m, that's between him and
Ken, just like if someone wants to give Todd $995,000 for his Dracula
poster - that's between Todd and the buyer.
We're not talking about a Forbidden Planet poster that is easily
found, or a Day the Earth Stood Still or a Dr No Quad, all posters
that can be had for a certain price and if someone were to ask $50,000
for any of them that we can all point to market sales indicating true
values.. The Metropolis poster is the equivalent of _"one of a kind
rarity"_ and is not subject to the same equivocations as posters that
you can find if you're looking.
For the record, I'm not shocked at the $2,000,000 asking price Ken has
on the poster - I'm shocked that he is interested in selling the
poster at all seeing as he worked so hard to put the money together to
buy it and saved so many months..
Rich
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
