Channing,

 

Yes, $11.50 for that card is a real bummer.  Yes, of course it's worth a lot
more, and you would have also gotten a lot more for it, had it not been on
eBay.  

I would have paid a lot more for it, but I simply don't have the time to
look daily through the endless mounds of ebay auctions. I think that is true
for a lot of people.  I go through some of Bruce's and Rich's auctions, just
out of habit, and because I know them.  That's about it.  Maybe a couple of
other dealers as well, from time to time.  But the obsessive habit of
sitting day in and day out and watching for bargains on ebay is long behind
me.  Who's got the time for it?  A few years ago it was still a novelty, but
nobody can keep up with the sheer avalanche of posters and lobby cards
heaped upon us daily via ebay and other on line auctions.

In other words, what I'm saying is there is so much stuff on ebay that
people simply are tuning off. 

 

Zeev

 

 

 

From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
channinglylethomson
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MOPO] Is there something wrong with this hobby?

 

Is there something wrong with this hobby?

 

I ask this for the following reason.  Today, I had an auction closing on
EBAY for an original 1941 lobby card -- a beautiful linen-paper portrait
card of Rita Hayworth and Fred Astaire in a tuxedo from YOU WERE NEVER
LOVELIER that I've had for years.  I started this auction low because I was
conducting a sort of test.  I wanted to see if a card like this would reach
its real value at auction on EBAY or not.  Well, unfortunately, the lobby
card sold for a closing amount of $11.50.  15 years ago this card would have
sold for between $125. and $200.  You probably could have made a phone call
and sold it for that. Now it sells for $11.50.  I posted the auction
announcement on various sites including two separate ones on MOPO.  It ended
up selling to a man in NYC for $11.50.

Now as you may imagine, I was disturbed that it sold for so little.  In the
future, I will probably only start one of these low opening bid, Bruce
Hershenson-style auctions if the piece is something like a lobby card or
poster for a major 1950s science fiction film or a classic movie or
obviously collectible poster or card.  I think a lobby card like this one is
still of value despite changing tastes.  Maybe I'm wrong but I think there
are still people who know who Rita Hayworth is and who Fred Astaire is and
admire their work and their films.  However, since no one in MOPO found this
worth bidding on, even if they could have gotten the card for as little as
$12.50, maybe I'm all wrong.

Thoughts please?

Channing Thomson

P.S.  One other consideration -- I live in a major American city (San
Francisco) where I routinely see elderly Chinese people digging through
trash cans all over downtown trying to find cans or plastic bottles for
recycling.  Sometimes they carry big plastic bags of these balanced on
bamboo polls over their shoulders.  These are men and women who are often as
old as 70 or 80.  You really can't go more than a block without seeing them
digging through the trash.  Nobody seems to think there's anything wrong
with this here but it disturbs me and makes me think we may actually be in a
depression rather than just one the typical recessions.  The economy
definitely BLOWS!

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to