Richard is right, as usual.

*http://www.emovieposter.com/imagearchive/poster/202495.html*

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Richard Evans <[email protected]>wrote:

> While since I've seen it too, but I think it was a lesser title like Across
> the Pacific or similar.
>
> On 20 Jul 2010, at 18:19, Wolfgang Jahn wrote:
>
> In PLAY IT AGAIN SAM there’s what looks like an original worn Casablanca
> 6sheet (or 3sh?) over the bed in a scene with Woody Allen and Diane Keaton.
> Anyone noticed that? Quite some time since I saw the film last time
> though..
> Wolfgang
>
> Kinoart.net
>
> *Von:* MoPo List 
> [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
> ] *Im Auftrag von *Michael B
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 20. Juli 2010 19:05
> *An:* [email protected]
> *Betreff:* [SPAM?]: [MOPO] a casablanca 6 sheet?
>
>
> wow,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a CASABLANCA 6 sheet.  i dont believe i have ever
> seen the 3sheet.
>
> wanna predict the amount it will sell for?  35/40,000?
>
> inserts are 10/15??
>
>
> michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 7/20/2010 12:06:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> Yes, it did sell for $388.38! Many good deals were had by buyers and now *
> is* a good time to buy! This was the fourth time to have sold this
> portrait card and all being different copies. And though this would normally
> sell in this day and age at $500-700, there are always tremendous deals in a
> Heritage auction, as it is all about who is watching at that time and
> participating.
> Thousands of participants buy and bid with us every day and we receive less
> than 1% in returns of merchandise for any reason.
>
> Overall the Auction did almost $1.2 million and counting, with many great 
> after-auction
> deals<http://movieposters.ha.com/common/search_results.php?N=54+794+4294957167>
>  to be had and they are moving fast!
> We set some great records for the more rare and some not so rare material.
> Over 1200 bidders participated in the auction and for those of you from this
> group who did participate, thank you so much. And for those just watching,
> that is appreciated too.
>
> We have a tremendous November auction shaping up now so please be saving
> for what is sure to be an outstanding selection!
> Highlights we are hoping to include:
>
> Public Enemy- one sheet
> Little Caesar- one sheet and Six Sheet
> Gold Rush - One Sheet and Twenty-four Sheet
> Animal Crackers - one sheet Style A
> Red Dust-  six sheet
> Frankenstein- six sheet
> Cavalcade – one sheet
> Casablanca –six sheet
>
> Notice: these are what are hoped for! ;-)
>
>
>
> *From:* MoPo List 
> [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
> ] *On Behalf Of *Bruce Hershenson
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:04 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] Slabbed Lobby Cards at Heritage
>
>
> Holy Macaroni, how did *THAT *card (certified to be "fine to very fine")
> sell for four hundred smackers? I sold that for $750 over 20 years ago! Like
> I have been saying, this is the best time in over 20 years to buy quality
> movie paper, even if you have to go through the annoyance of "de-slabbing"
> your item.
>
> Bruce
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Richard Evans <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> Very nice, the best card.
> And very similar condition to the one sold last Nov, (though judging by
> pics, the colours appear to be stronger on yours), but at 2/3 the price.
>
>
> Since taking my new lobby out of the plastic only de-values it if/when it
> comes time to resell it
>
>
> We can probably reserve judgement on that.
> With this particular card, (albeit in a difficult climate), it doesn't
> appear to have had a particularly positive effect.
>
>
>
>
> On 19 Jul 2010, at 17:41, Reel Classics Posters wrote:
> As the purchaser of a slabbed lobby card from Heritage this weekend, and a
> collector who's younger and much less experienced in this hobby than most of
> you, I thought I'd throw in a couple cents...
>
> The slabbed card I bought ($325 bid -->$400 all told) is the portrait card
> from MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON (1939), CGC graded 7.0, Heritage graded
> Fine/Very Fine:
>
> http://movieposters.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=7025&Lot_No=83797
>
> I'd never seen a CGC encapsulated lobby before this Heritage auction, and I
> actually emailed Heritage asking about it -- whether I'd be devaluing the
> card by removing it from the plastic, which I'm inclined to do so that when
> I frame it, it will look the same as my other framed lobby cards.  (Though I
> have a large box of posters under my bed, I always buy them with the
> intention of framing and hanging them; I'm just out of wall space for
> anything bigger than a window card at the moment.  I buy posters as
> decoration, not investments.)
>
> In addition to my query about CGC, I also asked Heritage about their
> *original* description (no longer up), which noted a tear in the top border
> (that I couldn't see), but said nothing about what appeared to be a large
> tear in the bottom middle that went up into the image area.  What's
> interesting is the reply I got from Bruce Carteron at Heritage:
>
> "Thanks for your inquiry. You can certainly take these out of the sleeves
> to hang them up. You would just have to have the card regraded again if you
> resold it. None of the defects were supposed to be mentioned when it was CGC
> graded. The tear was taken into consideration when it was graded
> originally."
>
> As I wanted the card to frame and hang (MR. SMITH being one of my "top
> five" favorite movies) and I didn't see the tear in the bottom as being too
> detrimental to its display value, given the limited bidding, I put in a
> small bid and won.  Still, I thought it interesting that for CGC cards,
> Heritage seemed to think that putting the CGC grade in the description was
> good enough.  Personally, I would have preferred the "tear here, crease
> there, three pinholes" kind of description they give for the rest of their
> lots, especially since this was a "Signature" auction.
>
> Long story short, I bought this card IN SPITE of its CGC encapsulation, not
> because of it.  I know I'm less sophisticated than most of you long-time
> collector/dealers.  I bought my first posters in 1997 from a price list I
> received in the mail.  I knew nothing about "sheet" sizes or even "R"
> re-release dates, let alone condition, and hadn't even seen an image of the
> posters I bought (based on film titles) until they arrived.  Needless to
> say, I've learned a lot since then (and replaced most of those original
> purchases with better quality posters in more reasonable sizes with better
> images from those titles).  Now I pay attention to things like condition and
> previous purchase prices (mostly from Bruce and Heritage's online
> databases), and buy fewer, better posters than I did when I started.  I also
> only buy from reputable dealers and haven't purchased a poster on eBay in at
> least five years.
>
> Since taking my new lobby out of the plastic only de-values it if/when it
> comes time to resell it, and in the meantime increases its value to me,
> that's probably what's going to happen to it when it arrives.  Thought that
> might interest some of you.
>
> Elizabeth
> ReelClassics.com
>
>       Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>  ___________________________________________________________________
>            How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>                                        Send a message addressed to:
> [email protected]
>          In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>                                     The author of this message is solely
> responsible for its content.
>
>        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>  ___________________________________________________________________
>             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>                                        Send a message addressed to:
> [email protected]
>           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>                                     The author of this message is solely
> responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing ListSend a message addressed to:
> [email protected] the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-LThe author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to