Thanks for the heads-up, Joe. I'll definitely add that to my reading list. I 
find the era fascinating.

I recently watched Alien Trespass, a spoof of 50s sci-fi movies, and in one 
scene after what has presumably been a night of lovemaking, a married couple 
wake up the next morning fully dressed lying across one of a pair of twin beds, 
the husband with one foot on the floor! An obvious poke at the Code.

>From what I know already about the Production Code, it was initially written 
>after the Fatty Arbuckle debacle but not really enforced until the Legion of 
>Decency threatened to start picketing theaters, which would have had an impact 
>on the studios' bottom line. I believe the LoD also had an in on the many 
>state censor boards across the country and could outright ban movies if it 
>thought them too "indecent." This is what gave them clout.

By the 60s, though, their power had waned, the culture had shifted and the 
studios could finally break away from the Code.

I look forward to reading the Breen bio. Thanks again for the tip!

Dave
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joseph Bonelli 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 10:50 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] It was the BREEN office......operating under Hayes


              I just finished the bio of Joe Breen which is a history of the 
Hayes and Breen era of censorship in Hollywood from 1934 to the mid-1960s.  
It's one of the most fascinating books I've ever read!!  Little did I realize 
as a 1950s teen, fascinated in the Catholic school library reading about 
forbidden movies, that it was representatives of what was then "my" church that 
controlled Hollywood censorship for 30 years!!  The production code was written 
by a Jesuit-- Fr. Daniel A Lord, S.J.  Please let no one be offended when I 
point out (as I learned in this book) that the Irish-Catholic point of view 
prevailed in most Hollywood films for over a quarter of a century.
              Read it and be amazed!!  Fascinating stuff.    

              Joe B in NOLA

              
http://www.amazon.com/Hollywoods-Censor-Joseph-Production-Administration/dp/0231143583


              --- On Mon, 9/27/10, Richard Halegua Comic Art 
<[email protected]> wrote:


                From: Richard Halegua Comic Art <[email protected]>
                Subject: Re: [MOPO] FA: Were there sexier European versions of 
early 1930s U.S. movies?
                To: [email protected]
                Date: Monday, September 27, 2010, 6:05 PM


                At 03:52 PM 9/27/2010, Roland Lataille wrote:
                > I thought the early Tarzan movies were pretty racy as far as 
what Jane was wearing or not wearing.

                can we say "Hayes office"

                        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
                  
___________________________________________________________________
                             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                                         Send a message 
addressed to: [email protected]
                           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                                      The author of this 
message is solely responsible for its content.
             
       


  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to