David is correct,
My response to "Paul Waines" this morning was a reply to what I thought had 
been a public posting and I was trying to tell him to be sure of what you are 
saying before you bet your life on something (as even the small amount of 
"facts" he posted are incorrect).
If I had realized it was a private message that I had been forwarded I would 
not have responded at all.
I still do not know Paul's reasons for sending me a copy of conversation 
between he and Grey, nor do I know of his reasons for hiding behind an alias.

When Peter and I first envisioned Movie Poster Exchange over a year ago, we 
initially included Ken in our plans because of his prior relationship with 
Peter from Majestic Posters.
During the course of the year, Ken was unable to be involved with the site as 
we had originally planned and the business was/is organized with Peter and me 
as the sole shareholders.
At the time, Peter and I were unaware of any of Ken's legal problems (and I 
can't blame him as I am sure no one wishes for this sort of thing to surface), 
we assumed that life as a newly single father and other time demands were 
pulling his interests away from ours and amicably split.

Ken later approached us about featuring the Metropolis poster on our website 
during our launch, and Peter was actually opposed to this, feeling (correctly) 
that we have built a sound business model and a fantastic site that will be 
able to stand on it's own.
But the price was reasonable based on its prior sale and it did allow us to 
take advantage of some publicity opportunities we may not have had otherwise, 
so Peter relented and we did spotlight the poster.

Peter and I first became aware of potential problems with the poster in an 
email that was sent to us (and copied to Bruce, Sotheby's, Christie's, and 
others) dated March 25th.
I quickly called and spoke with the trustee where I was assured that we were 
allowed to continue to accept offers on the poster, but Peter and I decided to 
remove it from the site so that focus could shift to the hundreds of other 
great items listed for sale by our consignors and our upcoming auctions 
(starting Sunday May 6th if you don't recall) on www.MoviePosterExchange.com

Grey was hired by the trustee to assist the Federal Government in the recovery 
of assets in this case. It does not mean that Heritage has anything else to do 
with the case, and Grey certainly was not "representing" the State of 
California or Robert Mannheim.
It is up to the Federal District Court to decide what is best to do, not Grey, 
not myself, not the creditors, or anyone else.
But considering the quality of Ken's collection, if it (or portions) are made 
available for sale, I would not be surprised if Heritage, "Paul Waines" (who 
apparently wants to pay double to triple value for items), or any number of 
other parties, express interest in it's content.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David Kusumoto 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 5:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] METROPOLIS THREE-SHEET WHEREABOUTS!


  * This latest saga explains why I, like many others perhaps, suffer from 
occasional MoPo fatigue.  It's too f____ draining.  I have a day job totally 
UNRELATED to posters.  And just now, my first time online today, I discover 
more than a dozen private messages in my inbox asking me to analyze what just 
happened with Sean's posting of the "so-called private e-mail exchange" between 
Grey and "Paul Waines."  Guys, I don't have the answers nor do I understand 
Sean's motives posting this (perhaps it was an accident) - nor do I understand 
the motives of "Paul Waines" other than he's obviously steamed at Heritage 
while presenting his "facts" in a way that's meant to be READ by the public.  
Grey is an upstanding and honest guy who I PERSONALLY know and like.  With his 
personality and demeanor, I often wonder what could POSSIBLY make some 
individuals want to drive a stake through his big Texas heart.

  * Note that I put "quotes" around the name, "Paul Waines" - and also around 
the word, "facts."  I'm always skeptical of the credibility of people who won't 
sign their names to their opinions - OR - who use an alias that sounds too 
similar to a REAL person.  "Paul Waines" is NOT the same Paul Waines associated 
with the All Poster Forum.  The real Paul Waines is in the U.K. with a 
logistical inability to be "on scene" with all that's detailed in the notes 
below sent to Grey.  What's the fallout to signing your real name?  Truth is 
the best defense in a libel case, and everything that's couched as an "opinion" 
is protected.

  * It's my view that the "Waines" cited below is an alias for someone in the 
U.S.  Why?  Because over the past few days, the alias "Waines" has been 
blind-copying several MoPo members with his posts.  He obviously feels he has 
something to lose by revealing himself.  I only get curious, 1) if I have time, 
WHICH ON MOST DAYS I DON'T, and, 2) if I do have time, if I can substantiate 
the relationship between the person "aggrieved" and his/her "target," and, 3) 
if the person is "real."  Failing those tests, I won't go public with anything 
but my own opinions.  And I sign everything that's potentially inflammatory.  

  * Based on the blind-copy I received from ONE of the notes I received from 
the alias "Waines," its I.P. locators are firmly in the EAST COAST OF THE U.S. 
- and NOT the U.K.  Draw your own conclusions.  That's all I plan to write on 
this subject.  Besides, my objectivity is already somewhat compromised when it 
comes to issues that personally involve Grey - because of my personal 
friendship with Grey.  -d.




  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to