Regarding Heritage's inventory, please see my prior post.

Regarding contracts and ways of doing business:

1. Please note that we are not in the business of buying and selling movie 
posters. We are retired from the movie business and have posters from the years 
of being in the business.  


2. The movie business is so small that back then, before the MBA's took 
over, it was a handshake and verbal agreement. The Star Wars deal for 
the Kenner toys was made verbally, and the contracts were typed in 
carbon.  

If you go to Cannes today, a lot of distribution deals are made verbally 
between people who trust each 
other. The paperwork doesn't get hammered out until everyone is aback at the 
office. 


3. Living in New Hampshire today, a lot of deals are still made verbally or 
with a handshake. Fifteen years ago, when we 
lived in Los Angeles, we knew people who had legal contracts with their 
nanny's and gardeners, but there are lots of places throughout the 
United States where John Deere and an honest handshake still reigns..


Regarding the value of the posters -- we are not in the poster business and did 
not want to spend a lot of time educating ourselves on their value or 
the best way of selling them. Despite that, we are probably better 
informed than a lot of people who consigned to Heritage -- especially 
seniors. When I researched our items disappearing at Heritage, I googled and 
found we are not alone. 


If you read 
my original post to Rudy, you will see that Rudy solicited us to consign 
posters to Heritage, and we consigned with Heritage solely based on the 
professional esteem Charley had of Rudy. We did not do a cold 
submission. We had contacted Rudy trying to identify some posters we 
had, and he was the one who pitched us on submitting to Heritage. He 
called back several times to make sure we had indeed sent a shipment.  
 

Regarding time line, Grey Smith took weeks to reply to my query about whether 
he 
had sent everything back to us. I had to send him multiple emails to get him to 
even reply claiming he had returned all our submissions.


While I can understand you wanting to lay the blame on our "unprofessional" 
behavior, let me remind you that we are not in the movie poster 
buying/selling business. We have a collection because we were in the 
movie business, and like a lot of people -- including our friends and 
colleagues who also retired  from the industry -- we were simply looking for a 
way to liquidate the collection. 




________________________________
 From: Sean Linkenback <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Article On Busted Collectibles Mention Movie Posters
 

I am with you Bruce.

Are they mad because they received a $10K+ check from Heritage for a poster 
that Heritage didn't even initially inventory?
(There is no October 2010 Signature sale, so I am guessing maybe she means the 
July 2010 sale of Clockwork Orange.)

Why did you send Heritage more posters if you believed they weren't giving a 
full accounting of your first shipment?
Why did you wait "several months" after sending the second batch to see if 
Heritage even got them?
Did you send these unsolicited? 
I can't imagine a scenario where I would send several thousand dollars worth of 
material to someone a second time if I was not pleased with how they were 
handling the first shipment and then wait several months before contacting them 
about the second.

This latest message raises a lot more questions on your part than it does on 
Heritage.

Sean


 
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Hershenson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 01:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Article On Busted Collectibles Mention Movie Posters

I am unclear about something. Is this an ongoing legal matter, or has it come 
to a resolution? 

Is the crux of the matter that you sent items without receiving an inventory 
list of what was sent and now they dispute that you ever sent some number of 
the items.

There are just so many details in the below that I have difficulty distilling 
it down to its essence.

Thanks.

Bruce


On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Geraldine Kudaka <[email protected]> wrote:


>Based on your recommendation and reputation, we sent a batch of 30-40+ posters 
>to Heritage. They sent back an inventory which was a partial list including 10 
>posters of the 30-40+ posters we shipped. We called Grey and he said these 
>were the posters they were going to put up for their March 2010 signature 
>auction, but that the posters which weren't going up be listed in their print 
>auction would be safe in their vault. A contract was sent for these 10 
>posters.  The balance was not sent in an inventory to us.
>
>We had gotten in touch with Paul Miller of http://www.starwarsmovieposter.com/ 
>. Paul is the expert on SW posters. He identified a batch of posters we had as 
>the Deko posters. Of the 30-40+ posters we had sent to heritage, we had 
>included 3 sections of the Deko 17 section posters. for his help in
 identifying and organizing our SW posters, we had promised to give Paul 1 of 
our 2 sets of mint, uncirculated Deko posters. Of course,we didn't have 2 full 
sets as we had mistakenly sent 3 of  a set to Heritage. I called Heritage to 
inquire about getting back our posters. Heritage pitched us on auction in their 
weekly the remaining balance of uninventoried posters.
>
>You, Rudy, got involved and tried to convince us the weekly posters would net 
>us enough that we should just go with Heritage. In the midst of this 
>conversation, we also found out a poster we had sent to Heritage -- which was 
>not on the signed inventory consignment contact -- was valuable -- a 1971 
>Clockwork Orange.
>
>We contacted Heritage and was told the inventoried contract only included 
>posters which would be listed in the March 2010 auction.
>
>Being the naive, trusting souls we are, we waited. After the Oct 2010 
>signature auction of Clockwork, we received a check for
 $11,050 as you and Heritage received $1,950 commission on the sale.
>
>This Clockwork Orange poster was never included in the Feb 2010 inventory -- 
>just like the Deko posters and 30 other posters. There is not signed contract 
>we have with Heritage for consigning of selling this poster as Heritage never 
>inventoried it.... or as far as we known, its never been inventoried, nor have 
>we signed a consignor agreement for the $13,000 poster.
>
>Nevertheless, pleased at the sale and believing our unsold lots were safe, we 
>sent another 30-40+ posters, including a 2nd John Lennon & Get Carter. Charley 
>and I packed them together. It took the two of us to roll them and secure them 
>into a shipping tube. Charley then mailed then.
>
>At 72, Charley is not the same man as he was when he contracted with Kenner to 
>produce Star Wars toys. He's older, and like a lot of us, has more problems 
>doing things which came easily to him when he was in his 20-30's.
 He has memory issues, and it takes him longer to type.
>
>Several months after shipping the second batch, I emailed Heritage. To make a 
>long story short, they claim that the only posters they received were  24 
>posters they received in an inventory they had gotten from Charley -- which 
>does not include the Lennon & Get Carter posters..
>
>After publicly denoucing Heritage, Grey offered to sell our posters without a 
>commission. You contacted us and said this was a good deal, we should go with 
>it. We refused. Grey sent a batch of posters back. It took a lot of emails but 
>Grey then stated he had returned all of our posters to us. 
>
>
>All? Based on an inventory procedure which did not include Clockwork Orange 
>and the Deko posters? 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>From: rudy franchi <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 1:08 AM
>
>Subject: [MOPO] Article On Busted Collectibles Mention Movie Posters
> 
>
>I gave an interview to Business Insider on collectible trends and movie posters
>were covered:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/7q3p988
>
>         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>   ___________________________________________________________________
>              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>                                    
>       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>                           
         
>    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>
>
>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>___________________________________________________________________
>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 


-- 
Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
P.O. Box 874
West Plains, MO 65775
Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take 
lunch)
our site
our auctions




Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
 
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to