WHY do you want to see the links? I CAN compile them, but it will take a while, and I don't see the value. So explain to me why and then I will see if it is worth my time to do so.
And I don't see why you object to me sending MY customers to your website.It is like in Miracle on 34th Street where Macy's sent customers to Gimbel's! Bruce On 6/15/12, Smith, Grey - 1367 <[email protected]> wrote: > Yet we still did not get the links? > > > From: Bruce Hershenson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 12:30 PM > To: Smith, Grey - 1367 > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters > > We mis-auctioned it SEVEN times, and you only did it three times, so we are > over twice as wrong and negligent as you were! We clearly explained what we > did. > > Since you took time to post, will you answer what your policy is in these > cases (will you offer refunds?) and will you correct the listings in your > online results? > > Bruce > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Smith, Grey - 1367 > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Odd as we have no direct link to the auctions from Emovieposter in which > they were incorrectly sold! > Please advise? > > From: MoPo List > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Bruce Hershenson > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 6:51 AM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters > > We recently auctioned a French one-panel poster from Blow-Up, and we said it > was from the first 1967 release, and then Thierry Brahme, co-owner (with > Holiday Russell) of All Poster Forum posted thqt it was a re-release. That > set us on a journey researching that poster (and the ones from the other > releases) and we came up with the following definitive answers (corroborated > by all the leading French poster experts and by the fine research available > on Ed Poole's LAMP site): > > There are three releases, and they look very similar (almost everything is > the same, except the R70s omits the 1967 from the top Cannes tagline) > > THIS IS ORIGINAL: > "1967" in the top Cannes tagline > "ATELIERS LALANDE 91-WISSOUS - TEL 920.98.75.76" > > THIS IS R69: > "1967" in the top Cannes tagline > "LALANDE COURBET 91-WISSOUS" > > THIS IS R70s: > NO "1967" in the top Cannes tagline > "Ste EXPL Ets LALANDE COURBET 91-WISSOUS" > > You can see a visual comparison here: > http://www.emovieposter.com/unused/blowup_research_reference_images.jpg > > Now the above information showed we had just auctioned a R69 as an original, > so of course we then contacted that buyer and told them what had happened > and cancelled the sale. > > We next went over our ENTIRE history of every auctioning versions of this > French poster, and discovered that we have only once had an original, and > that there were 4 times where we incorrectly identified a R69 as original > and three times where we incorrectly identified a R70s as a R69 (because we > were given erroneous information some years ago that led us astray). > > Fortunately, we keep accurate records of every past sale, so we contacted > those 7 buyers and offered to take back the seven posters for a full refund > (including shipping both ways so they lose nothing) or to make a partial > refund if the price they paid was too high based on the false info, EVEN IF > YEARS HAVE GONE BY, and we long ago paid the consignors. > > Once we have heard from all the buyers we will likely lose many hundreds of > dollars, but it is well worth it, because it lets our buyers know just how > much we stand behind everything we sell! > > We then took a quick look at the Internet to see if we could find other > examples that were being sold incorrectly. We found that Dave Lieberman of > Cinemasterpieces had one for sale that was a R69 but was incorrectly > identified as original, and we contacted him, and he promptly corrected it. > > We went to Heritage's archive on their site, and discovered that they > obviously had incorrect information (like we did) but they had DIFFERENT > incorrect information than we did, resulting in their selling three > different posters, one from each release, and identifying them incorrectly > every time. > > This is the original that they sold as R70s: > http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072>http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072> > > This is the R69 that they sold as 1966: > http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245>http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245> > > This is the R70s that they sold as R69: > http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052>http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052> > > Now hopefully they will go back and contact the two buyers to whom they sold > they posters they incorrectly identified (there is no need to contact the > third one, the one who got an original incorrectly marked as a re-release, > because that person got an incredible buy and is surely happy!). But they > may or may not have a policy of doing this. If they are followers of "buyer > beware", which so many auctions are, then those buyers are simply out of > luck. > > I also don't know if they will go into their online archive and correct the > above mistakes, as we do. We always correct any errors in our database, and > remove all sales where the buyer never paid or they returned the items, to > keep our database super accurate, but it takes a lot of time and money to do > so. > > IF ANYONE READING THIS OWNS AN EXAMPLE OF A FRENCH BLOW-UP POSTER, THEN YOU > SHOULD TAKE IT OUT AND CHECK TO SEE WHICH RELEASE YOU HAVE. If you were > incorrectly sold a re-release as either an original or as the wrong > re-release, then contact the person or auction you bought if from and ask > for a refund or a price adjustment. > > Thanks much to Thierry Brahme, Ed Poole and others who helped in this > research. > -- > Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team > P.O. Box 874 > West Plains, MO 65775 > Phone: 417-256-9616<tel:417-256-9616> (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 > to 1 when we take lunch) > our site<http://www.emovieposter.com/> > our auctions<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html> > > > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at > www.filmfan.com<http://www.filmfan.com> > ___________________________________________________________________ > How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List > Send a message addressed to: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L > The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. > > > > -- > Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team > P.O. Box 874 > West Plains, MO 65775 > Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take > lunch) > our site<http://www.emovieposter.com/> > our auctions<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html> > > [cid:~WRD000.jpg] > > -- Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team P.O. Box 874 West Plains, MO 65775 Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take lunch) our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/> our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
