I don't reply to your questions on forums because I have your account set
to "ignore" on the forums. Now that you have surfaced here, I will set you
to "ignore" here as well, so I won't be seeing your future posts here
either.

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:29 AM, filip de volder <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> ok , just became a member of heritage too to enlarge the picture (hadn't
> noticed it was an option on the heritage site ...) indeed clear ...  but so
> why doesn't Bruce  go through christies past auctions too as they've had
> the blow up poster on many occasions (including some i send them ) if  for
> some reason he needs to compare his own mistakes to mistakes others made ?
> ------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:05:06 +0000
>
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>
> Filip,
> When you look at the emlarged images from the Heritage archives, you can
> see the printer's information
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* filip de volder [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 03:22 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>
>  Hi Jeff , thanks , i know about the info Bruce posted (which as i said
> for a poster like this is information that for 30 years in business movie
> poster sellers is widely available and has never been a " curious " case
> !!) but i reffered to the NSFGE post where he ( again ) attacks in some way
> his concurrent heritage   showing *their* blow up sales where they're
> supposed to have made mistakes , i asked him to clarify his accusations as
> they don't seem correct when checking the *heritage* pictures  ...  Bruce
> being frustrated seeing all great posters being consigned to heritage
> should not be a reason for constantly trying to discredit them , that's
> been going on for years  and is a ridiculous playground mentality
>
> ------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:10:07 -0700
> To: [email protected]
>
> hi filip,
>
> bruce posted a follow up, showing the 3 printers and the corresponding
> years that the original and the 2 re-release posters issued. he also
> provided closeups of the printers information on each poster.
>
> he offered the links here in MOPO (and im assuming) NSFGE, too.
>
> check again. I think you will see the information.
>
> best.
>
> jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:47 PM, filip de volder wrote:
>
> hi, i'm new to this forum  but i see there's some same topics as on the
> nsfge site , regarding this blow up poster  i asked Bruce 2 questions : who
> is the foremost french dealer he mentioned  that was unaware of the
> different blow up releases (for such a collectable poster and information
> as for different releases being wildly available to any professional seller
> who knows what he's doing  this is totally unacceptable so collectors
> should be warned that next to an american based " professional " movie
> poster seller there's also one in france buyers should be aware  of )
>
> and regarding the links he posted on nsfge for the heritage blow up sales
> i asked where that he could tell from the pictures that one was and
> the other was not original (both with year and palm) as on the pictures
> they are identical unless when i checked them out i was momentarily bitten
> by stupidity ...
>
> no surprises here : no answer from Bruce ...
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:44:34 +0000
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
> To: [email protected]
>
> I remember when Bruce made a post asking if anyone could show him one of
> the Haggard fakes so that he wouldn't be fooled by one if someone ever sent
> any Universal Horror to him and Grey immediately stepped up and sent one to
> Bruce right away, as that is the kind of guy he is (though I guess Bruce
> didn't show it to any employees as they auctioned a fake Son of
> Frankenstein card while Bruce was out of town not long after).
>
> So I am sure Bruce must have extended the same sort of courtesy to Grey as
> he did to Lieberman.
>
> It's that kind of mutual respect and courtesy between dealers that makes
> our hobby so different from the rest.
> We don't have the back-biting and animosity that many other collectibles
> seem to have.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Franc [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 18, 2012 03:01 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>
> I guess after the seeminlgly endless flow of e-mail from Bruce, he was
> just too busy to answer this one!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Zeev
> Drach
> *Sent:* Monday, June 18, 2012 2:36 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>
> I don?t think we?ve received a response from Bruce to this question, have
> we?
>
>
> Zeev
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Sean
> Linkenback
> *Sent:* June 15, 2012 5:23 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>
>
> Bruce,
> did you contact Grey/Heritage before you made this public posting so that
> they could "quickly correct it" the way you did with Cinemasterpieces, or
> was your first inclination to post the information to MoPo as quickly as
> possible?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Bruce Hershenson 
> [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
> ]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 15, 2012 04:54 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>
> Here is a faster way to the seven items that were incorrectly listed:
>
> *
> http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/film_title/BLOW-UP/type/French%25201p/sort/4/archive.html
> *
>
> This has all the 9 Blow-Up posters we auctioned
>
> These were the two that were correct:
> *http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/archiveitem/2010215.html*<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/archiveitem/2010215.html>
> *http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/archiveitem/7989641.html*
>
> Those two have no year under them. The other seven are the ones we
> auctioned incorrectly.
>
> The release info on them has now been corrected. The original prices are
> still there until we see what the buyers tell us they want to do.
>
> If you want to use the above to create an email that you send to your
> customers, telling them that we listed *SEVEN *posters incorrectly, then
> that is fine with me.
>
> On 6/15/12, Bruce Hershenson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > WHY do you want to see the links? I CAN compile them, but it will take
> > a while, and I don't see the value. So explain to me why and then I
> > will see if it is worth my time to do so.
> >
> > And I don't see why you object to me sending MY customers to your
> > website.It is like in Miracle on 34th Street where Macy's sent
> > customers to Gimbel's!
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On 6/15/12, Smith, Grey - 1367 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Yet we still did not get the links?
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Bruce Hershenson [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 12:30 PM
> >> To: Smith, Grey - 1367
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
> >>
> >> We mis-auctioned it SEVEN times, and you only did it three times, so we
> >> are
> >> over twice as wrong and negligent as you were! We clearly explained what
> >> we
> >> did.
> >>
> >> Since you took time to post, will you answer what your policy is in
> these
> >> cases (will you offer refunds?) and will you correct the listings in
> your
> >> online results?
> >>
> >> Bruce
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Smith, Grey - 1367
> >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >> Odd as we have no direct link to the auctions from Emovieposter in which
> >> they were incorrectly sold!
> >> Please advise?
> >>
> >> From: MoPo List
> >> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>]
> >> On Behalf Of Bruce Hershenson
> >> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 6:51 AM
> >> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> >> Subject: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
> >>
> >> We recently auctioned a French one-panel poster from Blow-Up, and we
> said
> >> it
> >> was from the first 1967 release, and then Thierry Brahme, co-owner (with
> >> Holiday Russell) of All Poster Forum posted thqt it was a re-release.
> >> That
> >> set us on a journey researching that poster (and the ones from the other
> >> releases) and we came up with the following definitive answers
> >> (corroborated
> >> by all the leading French poster experts and by the fine research
> >> available
> >> on Ed Poole's LAMP site):
> >>
> >> There are three releases, and they look very similar (almost everything
> >> is
> >> the same, except the R70s omits the 1967 from the top Cannes tagline)
> >>
> >> THIS IS ORIGINAL:
> >> "1967" in the top Cannes tagline
> >> "ATELIERS LALANDE 91-WISSOUS - TEL 920.98.75.76"
> >>
> >> THIS IS R69:
> >> "1967" in the top Cannes tagline
> >> "LALANDE COURBET 91-WISSOUS"
> >>
> >> THIS IS R70s:
> >> NO "1967" in the top Cannes tagline
> >> "Ste EXPL Ets LALANDE COURBET 91-WISSOUS"
> >>
> >> You can see a visual comparison here:
> >> http://www.emovieposter.com/unused/blowup_research_reference_images.jpg
> >>
> >> Now the above information showed we had just auctioned a R69 as an
> >> original,
> >> so of course we then contacted that buyer and told them what had
> happened
> >> and cancelled the sale.
> >>
> >> We next went over our ENTIRE history of every auctioning versions of
> this
> >> French poster, and discovered that we have only once had an original,
> and
> >> that there were 4 times where we incorrectly identified a R69 as
> original
> >> and three times where we incorrectly identified a R70s as a R69 (because
> >> we
> >> were given erroneous information some years ago that led us astray).
> >>
> >> Fortunately, we keep accurate records of every past sale, so we
> contacted
> >> those 7 buyers and offered to take back the seven posters for a full
> >> refund
> >> (including shipping both ways so they lose nothing) or to make a partial
> >> refund if the price they paid was too high based on the false info, EVEN
> >> IF
> >> YEARS HAVE GONE BY, and we long ago paid the consignors.
> >>
> >> Once we have heard from all the buyers we will likely lose many hundreds
> >> of
> >> dollars, but it is well worth it, because it lets our buyers know just
> >> how
> >> much we stand behind everything we sell!
> >>
> >> We then took a quick look at the Internet to see if we could find other
> >> examples that were being sold incorrectly. We found that Dave Lieberman
> >> of
> >> Cinemasterpieces had one for sale that was a R69 but was incorrectly
> >> identified as original, and we contacted him, and he promptly corrected
> >> it.
> >>
> >> We went to Heritage's archive on their site, and discovered that they
> >> obviously had incorrect information (like we did) but they had DIFFERENT
> >> incorrect information than we did, resulting in their selling three
> >> different posters, one from each release, and identifying them
> >> incorrectly
> >> every time.
> >>
> >> This is the original that they sold as R70s:
> >> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072>
> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072<
> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072%3ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072>
> >
> >>
> >> This is the R69 that they sold as 1966:
> >> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245>
> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245<
> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245%3ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245>
> >
> >>
> >> This is the R70s that they sold as R69:
> >> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052>
> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052<
> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052%3ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052>
> >
> >>
> >> Now hopefully they will go back and contact the two buyers to whom they
> >> sold
> >> they posters they incorrectly identified (there is no need to contact
> the
> >> third one, the one who got an original incorrectly marked as a
> >> re-release,
> >> because that person got an incredible buy and is surely happy!). But
> they
> >> may or may not have a policy of doing this. If they are followers of
> >> "buyer
> >> beware", which so many auctions are, then those buyers are simply out of
> >> luck.
> >>
> >> I also don't know if they will go into their online archive and correct
> >> the
> >> above mistakes, as we do. We always correct any errors in our database,
> >> and
> >> remove all sales where the buyer never paid or they returned the items,
> >> to
> >> keep our database super accurate, but it takes a lot of time and money
> to
> >> do
> >> so.
> >>
> >> IF ANYONE READING THIS OWNS AN EXAMPLE OF A FRENCH BLOW-UP POSTER, THEN
> >> YOU
> >> SHOULD TAKE IT OUT AND CHECK TO SEE WHICH RELEASE YOU HAVE. If you were
> >> incorrectly sold a re-release as either an original or as the wrong
> >> re-release, then contact the person or auction you bought if from and
> ask
> >> for a refund or a price adjustment.
> >>
> >> Thanks much to Thierry Brahme, Ed Poole and others who helped in this
> >> research.
> >> --
> >> Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
> >> P.O. Box 874
> >> West Plains, MO 65775
> >> Phone: 417-256-9616<tel:417-256-9616 <#13803ddaedde8194_>> (hours:
> Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from
> >> 12
> >> to 1 when we take lunch)
> >> our site<http://www.emovieposter.com/>
> >> our auctions<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
> >>
> >>
> >> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at
> >> www.filmfan.com<http://www.filmfan.com>
> >> ___________________________________________________________________
> >> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> >> Send a message addressed to:
> >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> >> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> >> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
> >> P.O. Box 874
> >> West Plains, MO 65775
> >> Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we
> >> take
> >> lunch)
> >> our site<http://www.emovieposter.com/>
> >> our auctions<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
> >>
> >> [cid:~WRD000.jpg]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
> > P.O. Box 874
> > West Plains, MO 65775
> > Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we
> take
> > lunch)
> > our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/>
> > our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
> >
>
>
> --
> Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
> P.O. Box 874
> West Plains, MO 65775
> Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we
> take
> lunch)
> our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/>
> our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
>
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing ListSend a message addressed to:
> [email protected] the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-LThe author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing ListSend a message addressed to:
> [email protected] the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-LThe author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing ListSend a message addressed to:
> [email protected] the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-LThe author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing ListSend a message addressed to:
> [email protected] the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-LThe author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>
>  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>


-- 
Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
P.O. Box 874
West Plains, MO 65775
Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take
lunch)
our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/>
our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to